We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 116

IP rules the world

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2010

Interesting article in the New York Times this morning reports that Silicon Valley companies in the business of developing solar panels have been beaten to market by the Chinese, and that the Chinese are driving down prices and margins while the U.S. companies are struggling to gain enough efficiencies to enable them to compete

Check your insurance policy, and the case law, again

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 16 2010

I'm not sure why we can't seem to settle the question of what IP litigation is covered under the typical Comprehensive General Liability insurance policy

New green IP tool

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 18 2010

Here's a link to a new WIPO page, the IPC Green Inventory, that basically aggregates the various patent classifications relevant to "environmentally sound technologies" or "ESTs" so that one can search the relevant classifications

False patent marking - you can't fudge it

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 15 2010

Courts in several recent cases have held that one cannot avoid a charge of false patent marking by fudging the marking

False marking statute continues to gain ground in the Federal Circuit

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2010

The "patent marking statute," 35 USC 287(a), states that notice may be given to the public of the patented nature of an article by affixing the word "patent" or "pat" and the related patent number to the article or to its packaging

Got a design patent lawsuit? Hire a copyright lawyer

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2010

Businesses involved in design patent litigation would be well-served to consult IP counsel with copyright expertise

Patent litigation gets even harder for patentees

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2011

Although indisputably correct, the Federal Circuit ruling earlier this year that patentees could not rely on the "25 rule" in calculating damages can only serve to increase billings for experts and litigators, and raise costs for patentees

We have an injunction, why can't we get contempt?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2011

It is not always the case that once a court issues an injunction prohibiting further patent infringement , any further infringement will be punishable by contempt

Chief Judge sleet rules that plaintiffs' '932 patent' is not invalid for obviousness-type double patenting

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2011

By Memorandum Opinion entered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet, following a five-day bench trial, in Eli Lilly and Company, et al. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 08-335-GMS (D.Del., July 28, 2011), the Court set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Eli Lilly and Company and The Trustees of Princeton University, and against defendants, Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Barr Laboratories, Inc

Judge Stark grants defendants' motion to transfer venue to Central District of California

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2011

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 11-082-LPS (D.Del., July 18, 2011), the Court granted the motion of defendants, Genetech, Inc. and City of Hope, to transfer venue of three actions filed against them in the District of Delaware by plaintiff, Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (“HGS”), to the Central District of California