Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 116
IP rules the world
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 13 2010
Interesting article in the New York Times this morning reports that Silicon Valley companies in the business of developing solar panels have been beaten to market by the Chinese, and that the Chinese are driving down prices and margins while the U.S. companies are struggling to gain enough efficiencies to enable them to compete
Check your insurance policy, and the case law, again
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 16 2010
I'm not sure why we can't seem to settle the question of what IP litigation is covered under the typical Comprehensive General Liability insurance policy
New green IP tool
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 18 2010
Here's a link to a new WIPO page, the IPC Green Inventory, that basically aggregates the various patent classifications relevant to "environmentally sound technologies" or "ESTs" so that one can search the relevant classifications
False patent marking - you can't fudge it
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- November 15 2010
Courts in several recent cases have held that one cannot avoid a charge of false patent marking by fudging the marking
False marking statute continues to gain ground in the Federal Circuit
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 7 2010
The "patent marking statute," 35 USC 287(a), states that notice may be given to the public of the patented nature of an article by affixing the word "patent" or "pat" and the related patent number to the article or to its packaging
Got a design patent lawsuit? Hire a copyright lawyer
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 21 2010
Businesses involved in design patent litigation would be well-served to consult IP counsel with copyright expertise
Patent litigation gets even harder for patentees
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 28 2011
Although indisputably correct, the Federal Circuit ruling earlier this year that patentees could not rely on the "25 rule" in calculating damages can only serve to increase billings for experts and litigators, and raise costs for patentees
We have an injunction, why can't we get contempt?
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 23 2011
It is not always the case that once a court issues an injunction prohibiting further patent infringement , any further infringement will be punishable by contempt
Chief Judge sleet rules that plaintiffs' '932 patent' is not invalid for obviousness-type double patenting
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 7 2011
By Memorandum Opinion entered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet, following a five-day bench trial, in Eli Lilly and Company, et al. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 08-335-GMS (D.Del., July 28, 2011), the Court set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Eli Lilly and Company and The Trustees of Princeton University, and against defendants, Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Barr Laboratories, Inc
Judge Stark grants defendants' motion to transfer venue to Central District of California
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 23 2011
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 11-082-LPS (D.Del., July 18, 2011), the Court granted the motion of defendants, Genetech, Inc. and City of Hope, to transfer venue of three actions filed against them in the District of Delaware by plaintiff, Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (“HGS”), to the Central District of California
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Christopher R. Kinkade (10)
- Eric C. Osterberg (16)
- Eric S. Solotoff (1)
- Gerard P. Norton, Ph.D. (4)
- Gregory B. Williams (48)
- James M. Singer (30)
- Janet M. MacLeod (3)
- Jerald David August (1)
- Jonathan R. Lagarenne (1)
- Peter J. Butch (1)
