We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

The Patent Box: is it big enough?

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 3 2012

10 February 2012 marked the closure of the UK government’s period of consultation on the draft legislation for a ‘Patent Box’, which would aim to stimulate the UK economy by enhancing the desirability of the UK as a location for R&D

IRS concludes attorney fees related to generic drug patent infringement lawsuits must be capitalized

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2012

In a recent Chief Counsel Memorandum (“CCM”), the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) concluded (contrary to an established industry custom) that attorney fees incurred for investigatory patent research and to defend actions for patent infringement in connection with the filing of abbreviated new drug applications (“ANDAs”) were not deductible and instead must be capitalized