We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 230

In re Hubbell, Schense, Zisch, & Hall, No. 2011-1547 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2013)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2013

Four named inventors from a university appealed the examiner's rejection of their patent application (’509). The patent application had been abandoned

Function Media, LLC v. Google Inc., No. 2012-1020 (Fed. Cir. Feb 13, 2013)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2013

Special purpose computer-implemented means-plus-function limitations require the specification to disclose the algorithm for performing the function

Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. Guidetech, LLC, No. 2012-1018 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 20, 2013)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2013

The doctrine of equivalents does not apply where its application would vitiate one or more claim limitations of the patentee's patent. Even so, the

Patentee cannot allege assignor estoppel as basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 22 2013

The patent owner brought suit against co-inventor for (1) declaratory judgment violation of federal patent law; (2) declaratory judgment

Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

A claim construction must not exclude the preferred embodiments, the possibility of altering an accused device to meet claim limitations does not

Arkema Inc., et. Al., v. Honeywell International, Inc.

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

An alleged infringer may bring a declaratory judgment where the patentee's conduct puts it in the position of pursuing arguably illegal conduct or

Soverain Software, LLC, v. Newegg Inc.

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2013

The patentee brought suit alleging infringement of three patents related to software for conducting electronic commerce. At the close of evidence, the

Rexford Industries, LLC v. Habisit Belting , Inc.

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2013

The patent owner of a mechanical conveyor belt sued a competitor for infringement, and the infringement suit was stayed pending inter partes

Allflex USA, Inc. v. Avid Identification Sys., Inc., No. 2011-1621 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 17, 2013)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

An appeal is moot if the parties settle all of their claims and make a portion of the settlement payment contingent upon the outcome of the appeal

Intel Corp. v. Negotiated Data Solution, Inc. et. Al., no. 2011-1448 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2012).

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 26 2012

A broad patent license, without language to the contrary, extends to reissue patents that are granted after the term of the license agreement. The