Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 228

Biogen Idec, Inc. v. Glaxosmithkline LLC, No. 12-1120 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 16, 2013)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
May 1 2013

Statements made to overcome enablement rejection may limit claims in spite of plain meaning and claim differentiation. The district court adopted a

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int’l, Inc. et al. No. 11-1218, -1238 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 26, 2013)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
April 4 2013

Lost sales in foreign markets are not compensable patent damages; testimony of damages expert was improperly speculative; damages for price erosion

Aspex Eyewear, Inc. & Contour Optik, Inc. v. Zenni Optical LLC, No. 2012-1318 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
April 24 2013

The assertion of different claims in a subsequent suitwhen those claims all contain a limitation that has already been construed, in the same context

K-Tech Telecommunications, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al., No. 2012-1425, -1446 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 18, 2013)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
April 24 2013

A patentee need not anticipate non-infringement arguments or identify infringing products or devices in its pleading to adequately state a claim for

The secondary considerations of non-obviousness of commercial success, failure of others, and industry praise must be linked to the claimed invention, not pre-existing market share

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
August 31 2010

Patentee sued for infringement of a patent for a “bundle breaker” used for breaking multiple, uneven bundles of corrugated board

Function Media, LLC v. Google Inc., No. 2012-1020 (Fed. Cir. Feb 13, 2013)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
February 28 2013

Special purpose computer-implemented means-plus-function limitations require the specification to disclose the algorithm for performing the function

Bettcher Industries, Inc., v. Bunzl USA, Inc., No. 2011-1038, -1046 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 3, 2011)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
October 12 2011

A Patent Office examiner’s opinion on a patent’s validity is not “finally determined” and grounds for estoppel under 35 U.S.C. 315(c) in civil court unless all appeal rights regarding that decision, including in civil court, have been exhausted

Aventis Pharma S.A. & Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC v. Hospira, Inc. et al., Nos. 07-CV-0721 & 08-CV-0496 (Fed. Cir. April 9, 2012)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
April 11 2012

Inequitable conduct finding affirmed on the merits after Therasense, and claim construction and obviousness rulings upheld where appellant's proposed construction required imposing limitations not required by the claims or other intrinsic evidence

Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp., No. 2011-1313, -1372 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2012)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
October 19 2012

A licensee seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement bears the burden of proof in the limited circumstance where the license prevents the patentee from asserting a counterclaim for infringement

Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc., No. 2011-1219 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 7, 2012)

Winston & Strawn LLP
-
USA
-
August 17 2012

When a party took an objectively baseless claim construction position that was not supported by the evidence and there was no showing to negate subjective bad faith, the court found the assertion of infringement of that claim made the case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285, supporting an award of attorney’s fees apportionable only to that claim

next >

Search results

Biogen Idec, Inc. v. Glaxosmithkline LLC, No. 12-1120 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 16, 2013)

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int’l, Inc. et al. No. 11-1218, -1238 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 26, 2013)

Aspex Eyewear, Inc. & Contour Optik, Inc. v. Zenni Optical LLC, No. 2012-1318 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

K-Tech Telecommunications, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al., No. 2012-1425, -1446 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 18, 2013)

The secondary considerations of non-obviousness of commercial success, failure of others, and industry praise must be linked to the claimed invention, not pre-existing market share

Function Media, LLC v. Google Inc., No. 2012-1020 (Fed. Cir. Feb 13, 2013)

Bettcher Industries, Inc., v. Bunzl USA, Inc., No. 2011-1038, -1046 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 3, 2011)

Aventis Pharma S.A. & Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC v. Hospira, Inc. et al., Nos. 07-CV-0721 & 08-CV-0496 (Fed. Cir. April 9, 2012)

Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp., No. 2011-1313, -1372 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2012)

Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc., No. 2011-1219 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 7, 2012)

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea