We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 221

January 2013 patent report

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

The trolls started January with a bang. Several trolls started their first cases or filed significant additional cases, including: Express Card, EMG

Patent troll reform: existing laws do not protect retailers

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 15 2013

Between the National Retail Foundation coverage and the national news coverage of President Obama's statements on patent trolls, every retailer is

E.D. Texas Federal Court practice judicial roundtable

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

Friend and colleague Michael Smith, who writes the excellent and authoritative E.D. Texas Practice Blog, tipped me off to a Texas Lawyer roundtable

Vermont takes on patent trolls

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2013

Vermont has passed a bill, which the Governor is expected to sign into law (H.299) called "Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringements" - hat tip to

Customer suit exception as a patent troll solution

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

Santa Clara Law Professor Brian Love and Wilson Sonsini partner James Yoon have written a thought-provoking article (slated for publication in the

Arguments disclosed in summary judgment are preserved

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2013

Lefkow granted in part plaintiff CBOE’s motion to strike defendant ISE’s expert witness in this patent case, as follows: This case was not governed

Claim construction reconsidered in motion in limine

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 24 2013

Judge Lefkow considered defendant ISE’s arguments that the Court’s construction of “means for matching” was incomplete because it did not define an

Retail is troll’s hardest hit non-tech sector

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 24 2013

Santa Clara Law Professor Colleen Chien recently wrote an interesting article on Patently-O discussing some key patent troll statistics in light of

Expert may not opine on claim construction at trial

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

Judge Lefkow granted defendant ISE’s motion to exclude plaintiff CBOE’s evidence of non-infringing alternatives from the lost profits analysis in

Specific jurisdiction created by accrued sales to Illinois

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Judge Kennelly denied defendants U Lighting America and its sole officer and employee’s (collectively “ULA”) motion to dismiss this patent suit for