Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 346

Motion to stay pending inter partes review denied where the claim construction hearing had already occurred

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
June 19 2013

Defendant Omron Oilfield & Marine, Inc. ("Omron") filed a motion to stay pending an Inter Partes Review that it initiated against Plaintiff's

Motion to enforce settlement agreement denied where agreement was reached as to the amount of the settlement but party struck through two other material terms

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
June 17 2013

Graco Childrens Products Inc. ("Graco") filed a patent infringement action against Kids II, Inc. ("Kids II"). During discovery, Graco and Kids II

Emblaze v. Apple: court orders parties to meet and confer over motion to compel after Emblaze fails to justify how Apple's search terms were unduly burdensome

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
June 12 2013

In this patent infringement action, Apple moved to compel production from Emblaze based on search terms that Apple provided. Emblaze opposed the

Foreign parent could not seek lost profits based on sales lost by its United States subsidiary

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
June 10 2013

After Fujitsu Limited ("Fujitsu") filed a patent infringement action against Tellabs, Inc. ("Tellabs"), Tellabs filed a motion for summary judgment

Motion to intervene denied after jury verdict of patent infringement where third party had notice of case and could have intervened sooner

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
June 5 2013

After a jury determined that certain defendants induced infringement of the plaintiff's patents by, among other things, selling unregulated and

Apple's motion to dismiss based on invalidity and "divided infringement" denied as premature because court had not yet ruled on claim construction

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
June 3 2013

H-W Technology, L.C. ("H-W") filed a patent infringement action against Apple and several other defendants including Amazon and Buy.com. H-W alleged

Motion to exclude damage expert under Daubert denied where expert relied upon incremental profit and cross-examination was sufficient to challenge expert

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
May 28 2013

Plaintiff Alexsam, Inc. ("Alexsam") alleged infringement of several patents against Best Buy Stores, L.P. ("Best Buy") that pertain to stored

Motion to stay pending inter partes review denied without prejudice where inter partes review had not yet been granted

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
May 20 2013

Plaintiff Automatic Manufacturing Systems, Inc. ("AMS") manufactures and markets equipment used to print machine readable labels on glass microscope

Counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity dismissed as duplicative of infringement complaint and failure to plead any facts describing how the patent was invalid

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
May 14 2013

Plaintiff, The Sliding Door Company ("Sliding Door"), brought an action for patent infringement against KLS Doors, LLC ("KLS Doors") alleging

Stay pending inter partes review denied because defendant waited too long to file the petition and court had dedicated resources to determining claim construction

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
May 13 2013

Defendant Universal Remote Control, Inc. ("Universal Remote") filed a motion to stay a patent infringement action filed by Universal Electronics, Inc

next >

Search results

Motion to stay pending inter partes review denied where the claim construction hearing had already occurred

Motion to enforce settlement agreement denied where agreement was reached as to the amount of the settlement but party struck through two other material terms

Emblaze v. Apple: court orders parties to meet and confer over motion to compel after Emblaze fails to justify how Apple's search terms were unduly burdensome

Foreign parent could not seek lost profits based on sales lost by its United States subsidiary

Motion to intervene denied after jury verdict of patent infringement where third party had notice of case and could have intervened sooner

Apple's motion to dismiss based on invalidity and "divided infringement" denied as premature because court had not yet ruled on claim construction

Motion to exclude damage expert under Daubert denied where expert relied upon incremental profit and cross-examination was sufficient to challenge expert

Motion to stay pending inter partes review denied without prejudice where inter partes review had not yet been granted

Counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity dismissed as duplicative of infringement complaint and failure to plead any facts describing how the patent was invalid

Stay pending inter partes review denied because defendant waited too long to file the petition and court had dedicated resources to determining claim construction

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea