We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 268

S. 8 case not struck, despite prohibition order having issued in underlying s. 6 proceeding

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

In this case, the Prothonotary refused to strike a Statement of Claim brought pursuant to s. 8 of the NOC Regulations, and this decision was upheld

Pleadings amendment re s. 53 allowed trial judge to determine materiality of inventors names

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

Idenix brought a motion to amend its pleadings. The Prothonotary granted leave to make certain amendments, however denied leave to make certain

Court grants order adding inventor

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

The Applicant, Dr. Falk Pharma GMBH sought an order pursuant to s. 52 of the Patent Act to vary inventorship on a patent. The Application was

New trial ordered and injunction set aside due to a refusal to allow an amendment to the Defence and Counterclaim

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 3 2014

The Federal Court of Appeal has heard three related appeals from this proceeding in the Federal Court, and in the result, has sent the matter back

Appeal decision addresses the promise doctrine

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 3 2014

This decision relates to two appeals that were heard together and the reasons apply to both. The decision set out the parties’ positions and then

Leave to appeal to SCC granted for a section 8 damages case

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 3 2014

The Supreme Court has granted leave in a proceeding pursuant to section 8 of the PM(NOC) Regulations. Some of the issues to be decided in this

Pleadings amendment to a damages reference not allowed found to be a collateral attack on the final judgment

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 3 2014

Apotex moved to file an amended Responding Statement of Issues on a reference pursuant to Rule 153. According to the Court, Apotex wants to argue

Patent not eligible for listing: patent claiming one medicinal ingredient,but directed to a fixed-dose combination of medicines

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 15 2014

This was an appeal from two decisions for three proceedings before Prothonotary Milczynski, in which she determined that a patent could not be listed

Court determines beneficial ownership of several patents as part of action for wrongful conduct

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 15 2014

This was an action by the Plaintiff for relief arising from the allegedly wrongful conduct of the Defendant Li. The Plaintiff claimed that Li

Federal Court overturns Prothonotary’s order striking paragraphs from Defence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 7 2014

This was a motion appealing the order of a prothonotary in the context of a patent infringement case. In the order appealed from, the Prothonotary