We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 324

Court grants order adding inventor

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

The Applicant, Dr. Falk Pharma GMBH sought an order pursuant to s. 52 of the Patent Act to vary inventorship on a patent. The Application was

S. 8 case not struck, despite prohibition order having issued in underlying s. 6 proceeding

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

In this case, the Prothonotary refused to strike a Statement of Claim brought pursuant to s. 8 of the NOC Regulations, and this decision was upheld

Pleadings amendment re s. 53 allowed trial judge to determine materiality of inventors names

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

Idenix brought a motion to amend its pleadings. The Prothonotary granted leave to make certain amendments, however denied leave to make certain

Documents included in joint book for trial should be exhibits for appeal

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 11 2012

The issue to be determined relates to the contents of the appeal books

Patent refused listing on the Patent Register

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 30 2012

The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a decision of the Minister of Health refusing to list a patent on the Patent Register

Reply affidavits allowed when new documents introduced in responding evidence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 9 2014

In this case, there is a partial reversal of evidence. Apotex brought a motion for leave to file reply evidence. Allergan did not oppose parts of the

NOC proceeding dismissed on the basis of overbreadth and a lack of sound prediction

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 13 2013

In this case, one claim of a patent was at issue in the proceeding. The claim related to the use of pregabalin or its racemate to treat pain. The

Patentable subject matter clarity or prolonged confusion?

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 21 2011

It’s back to the “check-out” counter for Amazon.com’s (Amazon) “one-click” patent application

Claim to disgorgement of profits denied by Ontario Court of Appeal

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 18 2013

Apotex appealed in the Ontario Court of Appeal from a partial summary judgment that dismissed its unjust enrichment claim for the disgorgement of the

Product specificity requirement trumps patent construction for listing

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 5 2014

Lilly sought to list Canadian Patent No. 2,379,329 on the patent register for their product TRIFEXIS. The Minister refused, stating that the patent