We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 337

Application for an order of prohibition dismissed for formulation patent

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 18 2015

The Court found that Mylan’s allegations of non-infringement and obviousness were justified. As a result, the application for prohibition was

Doctrine of bona fide purchaser for value without notice applies to patent rights

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 6 2012

This case involves a dispute over who owned certain patent rights

Reply affidavits allowed when new documents introduced in responding evidence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 9 2014

In this case, there is a partial reversal of evidence. Apotex brought a motion for leave to file reply evidence. Allergan did not oppose parts of the

Court grants motion to reopen trial and admit new evidence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 27 2011

The Federal Court granted leave to reopen the trial and admit new evidence in a matter under reserve, in which no reasons or judgement have issued

PMPRB finds drug to be excessively priced

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 5 2012

This is the redetermination of a matter before the PMPRB

Pleadings for disgorgement of profits and for an accounting of profits in s.8 damages not struck in Ontario court

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 1 2012

In this case, Apotex has claimed damages in Ontario Court pursuant to, inter alia, section 8 of the NOC Regulations. Lilly brought a motion to strike out parts of Apotex’ statement of claim

Motion for default judgment denied without affidavit evidence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 28 2013

The Plaintiffs brought a motion for default judgment after no Statement of Defence was filed and no response to the Request to Admit was provided. The

Appeal of the re-examination board’s decision dismissed: three claims rejected

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 4 2014

This was an appeal of a decision of a Re-Examination Board cancelling three claims of Newco Tank Corp.’s (“Newco”) Canadian Patent No. 2,421,384 (the

Decision of Re-Examination Board affirmed on standard of reasonableness

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 11 2015

The Re-examination Board found the Claims of a patent obvious in light of prior art submitted by the person requesting re-examination. In so holding

Application for an order of prohibition is dismissed for a unit dose patent

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 23 2015

The Court found that Mylan’s allegations of lack of utility, anticipation and obviousness were justified. As a result, the application was dismissed