We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 465

Supreme Court to hear androgel reverse payment case

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2013

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to address whether and when "reverse payment" agreements

House, Senate pass changes to America Invents Act and patent term adjustment

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 8 2013

The Senate has passed a modified version of HR 6621, which focuses on changes "to correct and improve certain provisions of the Leahy-Smith America

Final phases of patent reform now upon us mark March 16, 2013 on your calendar and plan now

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2013

The final phases of US patent reform become active on March 16, 2013 when the US patent system switches to a "first-to-file" system. The US PTO has to

One more patent jungle this time in nanotechnology?

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2013

I saw this recent article on the "nanotechnology patent jungle." The article refers to another recent article on the subject of making nanotechnology

Federal Circuit finds patent marking is circumstantial evidence of infringement

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2013

In Frolow v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co., the Federal Circuit refused to adopt the doctrine of marking estoppel, but held that evidence that Wilson had

Today is the deadline for commenting on the USPTO’s proposed Supplemental Examination rules

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2012

Today, March 26, 2012, is the deadline for submitting public comments on the USPTO’s proposed rules for implementing the Supplemental Examination provisions of the America Invents Act

Senate to debate patent reform after cloture vote

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 6 2011

The Senate is scheduled to debate patent reform on Wednesday September 7, 2011

En banc Federal Circuit confirms the written description requirement is separate and distinct from enablement

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 2 2010

Securing strong patents in the medical device area may well be greatly influenced by a very recent and important Federal Circuit decision

Oral argument today in key false marking case: Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, Inc

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 3 2010

On August 3, 2010, a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CJ Rader, J Lourie, and J Moore) heard oral argument in Stauffer v Brooks Brothers, Inc, Nos 09-1428 et al (Stauffer

Recent changes in patent eligibility will impact the securities and banking industries

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2010

Two important recent events are likely to impact the patenting of inventions related to the securities and banking industries