We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 179

U.S.-centered negotiations for product made and sold outside United States do not constitute sale or offer for sale in United States

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 26 2014

In a case exploring the limits of what constitutes a sale or offer for sale “within the United States” under 35 U.S.C. 271(a), the U.S. Court of

Generics challenge to Crestor patent fails

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2013

In a case involving multiple defendants seeking to sell generic versions of the drug rosuvastatin calcium, currently marketed as Crestor, the U

Two respondents receive show cause order in Inv. No. 337-TA-763

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 24 2011

Chief ALJ Luckern issued an order to show cause why two respondents, Koko Technology Ltd. and Cyclone Toy & Hobby, should not be found in default in Inv. No. 337-TA-763, Certain Radio Control Hobby Transmitters and Receivers and Products Containing Same

Federal Circuit affirms structural obviousness analysis

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 30 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in addressing the standard for establishing when a chemical compound is obvious based on prior art compounds, reiterated its two-part framework earlier established in Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. Alphapharm Pty., Ltd. (see IP Update, Vol. 10, No. 7

Freescale Semiconductor files new complaint

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 5 2011

On November 30, 2011 Freescale Semiconductor filed a complaint at the International Trade Commission alleging a violation of Section 337 based on the importation, sale before importation, or sale after importation of U.S. Patent No. 5,467,455

Federal Circuit upholds ITC’s authority to enforce consent order covering third-party products

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC, the

Commission issues notice of determination not to review ID terminating investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On September 21, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review an initial determination terminating Inv. No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effect Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing Same, as to Respondents Optoma Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. based upon a settlement agreement

New complaint filed by Rovi Corporation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2011

Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., United Video Properties, Inc., and Gemstar Development Corporation filed a letter on July 26, 2011, requesting that the International Trade Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 covering Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology

New complaint filed by Technology Properties Ltd

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2012

Technology Properties Ltd. has filed a new complaint at the ITC seeking an investigation into the importation of Certain Computer and Computer Peripheral Devices and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same

Target date set in Inv. No. 337-TA-780

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2011

ALJ Essex set a sixteen month target date of October 30, 2012, with a final determination due by June 30, 2012 in Inv