We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 177

Federal Circuit reverses ITC violation of its own rules

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a ruling by the International Trade Commission (ITC, the Commission), finding that, under

Generics challenge to Crestor patent fails

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2013

In a case involving multiple defendants seeking to sell generic versions of the drug rosuvastatin calcium, currently marketed as Crestor, the U

Federal Circuit rejects writ of mandamus concerning waiver of argument

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

In a brief order, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a writ of mandamus filed by Nokia Corporation seeking to compel the U.S

Commission decides to review the final initial determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-724

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 6 2011

On September 2, 2011, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a notice that it will review a final initial determination (“ID”) made in Certain Electronic Devices with Image Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software

Court determines RAND rate for standard-essential patents

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington became the first U.S. court to set fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND or

Joint (direct) infringement still requires control but stay tuned

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2011

A sharply divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, addressing the requirements for direct infringement if more than one party performs the steps of the patented method, ruled that the doctor-patient relationship was insufficient to show that the patient was acting under the direction or control of the doctor. McKesson Techs. Inc. v. Epic Sys. Corp., Case No. 10-1291 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2011) (Linn, J.) (Bryson, J. concurring) (Newman, J., dissenting

Inv. No. 337-ta-773 terminated as to Sony Ericsson respondents

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2011

ALJ Gildea granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Ogma, LLC and Respondents Sony Ericsson Mobil Communications (USA) Inc. and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB (collectively “Sony Ericsson”) to terminate Investigation No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing Same, as to Sony Ericsson

New target date set in i Inv. No. 337-TA-747

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2011

ALJ E. James Gildea issued an order on April 4, 2011 amending the target date and resetting the procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-747, Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology, due to the ongoing events in Japan

Obviousness-type double patenting requires a reason to modify with a reasonable expectation of success

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2012

Addressing the issue of obviousness-type double patenting, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reaffirmed its earlier rulings that obviousness must be judged by whether the differences in subject matter between the new claim and the earlier claim are patentably distinct

Commission issues notice of determination not to review ID terminating investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On September 21, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review an initial determination terminating Inv. No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effect Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing Same, as to Respondents Optoma Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. based upon a settlement agreement