Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 169
Cross Match Technologies files appeal with Federal Circuit in biometric scanning devices investigation
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- October 21 2011
On October 18, complainant Cross Match Technologies filed a notice of appeal with the Federal Circuit of the Commission's decision in Inv. No. 337-TA-720, Certain Biometric Scanning Devices, Components Thereof, Associated Software, and Products Containing the Same
Commission declines to issue consent order in Inv. No. 337-TA-568
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- November 14 2011
The Commission has declined to enter a consent order, and instead terminated on the basis of a settlement agreement, Inv. No. 337-TA-568, Certain Products and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Recombinant Human Erythropoetin
Generics challenge to Crestor patent fails
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- January 31 2013
In a case involving multiple defendants seeking to sell generic versions of the drug rosuvastatin calcium, currently marketed as Crestor, the U
Joint (direct) infringement still requires control but stay tuned
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- May 28 2011
A sharply divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, addressing the requirements for direct infringement if more than one party performs the steps of the patented method, ruled that the doctor-patient relationship was insufficient to show that the patient was acting under the direction or control of the doctor. McKesson Techs. Inc. v. Epic Sys. Corp., Case No. 10-1291 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2011) (Linn, J.) (Bryson, J. concurring) (Newman, J., dissenting
ALJ Bullock issues initial determination terminating the investigation as to drugstore.com
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- March 9 2012
On March, 9, 2012, Chief ALJ Bullock issued an initial determination granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent drugstore.com based on a consent order stipulation in Inv. No. 337-823, Certain Kinesiotherapy Devices and Components Thereof
Commission declines review of remand ID, terminates Inv. No. 650
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- July 13 2010
The Commission declined review today of a May 27, 2010 initial determination by ALJ Gildea, finding no violation of Section 337 with respect to one patent, and terminated Inv. No. 337-TA-650, Certain Coaxial Cable Connectors and Components Thereof and Products Containing Same
Litepanels files new 337 complaint
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- August 4 2011
Litepanels, Ltd. and Litepanels Inc. (collectively “Litepanels”) filed a Complaint concerning Certain LED Photographic Lighting Devices and Components Thereof, which asserts five patents
Federal Circuit affirms structural obviousness analysis
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- May 30 2012
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in addressing the standard for establishing when a chemical compound is obvious based on prior art compounds, reiterated its two-part framework earlier established in Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. Alphapharm Pty., Ltd. (see IP Update, Vol. 10, No. 7
ALJ Essex denies motion to supplement expert report
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- March 6 2012
On March 6, 2012, ALJ Essex denied the Trek Complainants’ motion for leave to supplement their opening infringement expert report
ALJ Bullock denies summary determination motions in Inv. No. 337-TA-704
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- August 26 2010
ALJ Bullock issued two orders denying summary determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-704, Certain Mobile Communication Devices and Components Thereof
Current Search
- Workarea - Patents

- Author - Christopher L. May

- Jurisdiction - USA

- Firm Name - McDermott Will & Emery

Suggested Facets
Author
- Blair M. Jacobs (131)
- Christina A. Ondrick (143)
- Clifford R. Lamar, II (1)
- Paul Devinsky (1)
- Robert J. Walters (131)
- Whitney D. Brown (1)