We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 179

Generics challenge to Crestor patent fails

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2013

In a case involving multiple defendants seeking to sell generic versions of the drug rosuvastatin calcium, currently marketed as Crestor, the U

ALJ Essex sets procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-817

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 7 2012

On February 7, 2012, ALJ Essex set the procedural schedule for Investigation No. 337-TA-817, Certain Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, Including Power Over Ethernet Telephones, Switches, Wireless Access Points, Routers and Other Devices Used in LANs and Cameras

Wrongful injunction raises presumption of recovery of bond

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2011

In a case of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that wrongfully enjoined parties are entitled to a presumption in favor of recovery against an injunction bond for provable damages

Inv. No. 337-TA-801 terminated in its entirety

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 5 2011

On October 4, 2011, ALJ E. James Gildea granted the parties joint motion to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-801, Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology, in its entirety

U.S.-centered negotiations for product made and sold outside United States do not constitute sale or offer for sale in United States

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 26 2014

In a case exploring the limits of what constitutes a sale or offer for sale “within the United States” under 35 U.S.C. 271(a), the U.S. Court of

Federal Circuit reverses ITC violation of its own rules

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a ruling by the International Trade Commission (ITC, the Commission), finding that, under

Commission issues notice of determination not to review ID terminating investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On September 21, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review an initial determination terminating Inv. No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effect Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing Same, as to Respondents Optoma Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. based upon a settlement agreement

New complaint filed by Rovi Corporation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2011

Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., United Video Properties, Inc., and Gemstar Development Corporation filed a letter on July 26, 2011, requesting that the International Trade Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 covering Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology

New complaint filed by Technology Properties Ltd

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2012

Technology Properties Ltd. has filed a new complaint at the ITC seeking an investigation into the importation of Certain Computer and Computer Peripheral Devices and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same

Target date set in Inv. No. 337-TA-780

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2011

ALJ Essex set a sixteen month target date of October 30, 2012, with a final determination due by June 30, 2012 in Inv