We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 179

Generics challenge to Crestor patent fails

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2013

In a case involving multiple defendants seeking to sell generic versions of the drug rosuvastatin calcium, currently marketed as Crestor, the U

Federal Circuit rejects writ of mandamus concerning waiver of argument

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

In a brief order, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a writ of mandamus filed by Nokia Corporation seeking to compel the U.S

Technology Properties Limited LLC files new 337 complaint

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 24 2011

Technology Properties Limited LLC ("TPL") filed a Complaint concerning Certain Digital Photo Frames and Image Display Devices and Components Thereof, which asserts four patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,976,623, 7,162,549, 7,295,443, and 7,522,424

Inv. No. 337-TA-773 terminated as to respondents Optoma Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc.

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2011

On September 6, 2011, ALJ E. James Gildea issued an initial determination that granted a joint motion to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing the Same, as to Respondents Optoma Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. (collectively “Optoma”

Obviousness-type double patenting requires a reason to modify with a reasonable expectation of success

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2012

Addressing the issue of obviousness-type double patenting, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reaffirmed its earlier rulings that obviousness must be judged by whether the differences in subject matter between the new claim and the earlier claim are patentably distinct

Court determines RAND rate for standard-essential patents

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington became the first U.S. court to set fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND or

Federal Circuit ruling clears way for approval of generic version of Fentora

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

Addressing allegations of patent infringement by a generic version of Fentora, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed in

Federal Circuit upholds ITC’s authority to enforce consent order covering third-party products

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC, the

Federal Circuit panel affirms finding of no domestic industry based on ongoing litigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2013

The Federal Circuit recently upheld the decision of the U.S. International Trade Commission that Motiva, LLC had failed to satisfy the domestic

Commission finds no violation, terminates investigation 337-TA-670

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2010

The Commission has found no violation of Section 337 in Inv. No. 337-TA-670, Certain Adjustable Keyboard Support Systems and Components Thereof, and terminated the investigation