We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 137

ALJ Rogers denies motion to quash a subpoena issued to non-party dupont and permits complainant to present live testimony of DuPont witness

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2012

On March 5, 2012, ALJ Rogers issued an order denying complainant Kaneka Corporation’s motion to quash the subpoena ad testificandum issued to E.I

Rambus appeals to Federal Circuit following Commission's determination of patent invalidity

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2010

On August 19, 2010, complainant Rambus, Inc. filed a notice of appeal with the Federal Circuit challenging the Commission’s determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-661, Certain Semiconductor Chips Having Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory Controllers and Products Containing Same

ALJ Charneski denies Nokia's third motion to show cause in Inv. No. 337-TA-701

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2010

In Inv. No. 337-TA-701, Certain Electronic Products, Including Mobile Phones, Portable Music Players, and Computers, ALJ Charneski issued an order denying complainants Nokia Corp. and Nokia Inc.'s motion seeking an order requiring respondent Apple, Inc. to show cause why it should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with orders relating to Apple's production of source code files and other documentation relating to Nokia's infringement claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,073,036

Federal Circuit issues opinion in Pass & Seymour v. ITC

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2010

On August 27, 2010 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the holding of the International Trade Commission in Inv. No. 337-TA-615, that certain accused products produced by Respondents General Protecht Group, Wenzhou Trimone Science and Technology Electric Co. Ltd. and Shanghai ELE Manufacturing Corporation do not infringe the asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 5,594,398 and 7,212,386, held by Complainant Pass & Seymour, Inc

ALJ Rogers issues final ID finding no infringement in bulk welding wire investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2010

On August 31, 2010, ALJ Rogers issued a lengthy Final Initial Determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-686, Certain Bulk Welding Wire Containers and Components Thereof and Welding Wire, finding that respondents ESAB AB of Sweden and Sidergas SpA of Italy do not infringe complainants Lincoln Electric Company and Lincoln Global, Inc.’s U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,864

ALJ Bullock denies summary determination motions in Inv. No. 337-TA-704

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2010

ALJ Bullock issued two orders denying summary determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-704, Certain Mobile Communication Devices and Components Thereof

Federal Circuit issues opinion in General Protecht Corp v. ITC

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2010

On August 27, 2010, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion on the appeal from Inv. No. 337-TA-615, General Protecht Corp. v. ITC

En banc Federal Circuit affirms ITC decision on patent misuse

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2010

On August 30, 2010, the en banc Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the ITC in Inv.No. 337-TA-474 (Princo Corp, et al. v. International Trade Commission, et al., Fed. Cir. 2007-1386

Commission declines review of ID terminating DC-DC Controller investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2010

The Commission has determined not to review an initial determination terminating Investigation No. 337-TA-698, Certain DC-DC Controllers And Products Containing Same

MIPO files unilateral motion to terminate investigation based on consent order

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 21 2010

MIPO Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and MIPO Technology Limited (collectively "MIPO") filed a unilateral motion to terminate the investigation based on a consent order in Inv. No. 337-TA-723, Certain Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads and Components Thereof