We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 114

Teva Canada Innovation v. Attorney General of Canada

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 8 2013

The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (the PMPRB) ordered Teva to pay the Crown approximately $2.4 million for selling its product at an

Intellectual property weekly abstracts bulletin

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 1 2013

The Court granted a Prohibition Order to AstraZeneca, preventing Ranbaxy from entering the market with a generic version of ompeprazole until the

Patent refused listing on the Patent Register

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 30 2012

The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a decision of the Minister of Health refusing to list a patent on the Patent Register

Court refuses to reconsider or vary its decision relating to redetermination

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 7 2010

The Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (PMPRB) made a decision that Teva’s product COPAXONE had been sold at an excessive price

Court grants motion to reopen trial and admit new evidence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 27 2011

The Federal Court granted leave to reopen the trial and admit new evidence in a matter under reserve, in which no reasons or judgement have issued

NOC proceeding dismissed on the basis of overbreadth and a lack of sound prediction

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 13 2013

In this case, one claim of a patent was at issue in the proceeding. The claim related to the use of pregabalin or its racemate to treat pain. The

Divisional patent application can be filed by applicant not named in original application

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 15 2010

This case is a judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of Patents where recognition of a patent application as a divisional application was denied

Lilly v. Apotex

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 29 2010

Eli Lilly brought suit against Apotex alleging that it infringed eight (8) process patents

Appeal of decision denying interlocutory injunction dismissed

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 4 2011

This was an appeal of a decision of the Federal Court, refusing an interlocutory motion

Commissioner cannot undo acceptance of maintenance fees

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 18 2011

In this case, the Court made several findings of fact relating to the timing of events