We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 15,367

Early lessons on Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International and Section 101 from recent court decisions

  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 19 2014

In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014), the US Supreme Court held that claims to “generic computer implementation” of

High Court to be asked to consider patentability of BRCA genes

  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 18 2014

Lawyers acting for the Appellant in the BRCA gene case have announced that they will seek special leave to appeal the decision to the High Court of

The Court of Milan in Sanofi v. Teva “repeats” the CJEU judgment in Actavis

  • Martini Manna
  • -
  • European Union, Italy
  • -
  • September 18 2014

By judgment No. 985514 published on 1 August, the Business Chamber “A” of the Court of Milan has decided the lawsuit filed by Sanofi against Teva

ITC decides to review in part Initial Determination in Certain Digital Media Devices (337-TA-882)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 18 2014

On September 12, 2014, the International Trade Commission (the "Commission") issued a notice determining to review in part the Initial Determination

Certificati protettivi complementari: il Tribunale di Milano in Sanofi v. Teva “replica” la sentenza della CGUE nel caso Actavis

  • Martini Manna
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • September 17 2014

Con sentenza n. 985514 pubblicata lo scorso 1 agosto, la Sezione Specializzata in Materia di Impresa "A" del Tribunale di Milano ha deciso il

PTAB rejects unusual inventor testimony that his own invention was not reduced to practice and finds his claims not unpatentable

  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2014

September 17, 2014 - In a final written decision, the PTAB found the petitioner failed to prove challenged claims unpatentable and rejected "unusual"

IPR petition barred under 35 U.S.C. 315(b)

  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2014

September 17, 2014 - The PTAB denied a petition for inter partes review as barred under 35 U.S.C. 315(b) because the PTAB determined that the

Patent case: Federal Circuit provides guidance on damages that eschews use of Nash Bargaining Solution (Virnetx v. Cisco)

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2014

Yesterday, in Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, No. 2013-1489, the Federal Circuit ruled that an expert's damages testimony was not admissible. The

Unified Patent Court Preparatory Committee publishes updated roadmap

  • D Young & Co
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • September 17 2014

The Preparatory Committee of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) published a revised roadmap on 16 September 2014. This provides an update on progress

Supreme Court rules on patentable subject matter in Alice

  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2014

On June 19 2014 the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corporation v CLS Bank International. This case dealt with what constitutes patentable