We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 15,172

Federal Circuit upholds validity of Lysteda patents

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

In two decisions issued under the same name (Ferring B.V. V. Watson Laboratories, Inc.), the Federal Circuit upheld the validity of the Orange

PTAB highlights: voluminous declaration leads to PTAB denial of IPR petition

  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

In a decision of interest, the PTAB denied institution of inter partes review due to the Petitioner's excessive reliance on a voluminous supporting

PTAB highlights: PTAB continues hard line on motions for additional discovery, grants some limited additional discovery

  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

The PTAB continues to take a hard line on motions for additional discovery, but shows a willingness to grant some limited additional discovery, as

Divisional applications in New Zealand prepare for the future

  • James & Wells Intellectual Property
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • August 27 2014

New Zealand has passed a new Patents Act. The new Patents Act comes into force as of 13 September and will implement some significant changes to New

Costa Rica divisional applications

  • CastroPal Abogados
  • -
  • Costa Rica
  • -
  • August 27 2014

For several years, it was a common practice to file divisional applications filing the same set of claims as the ones in the parent application. Said

Where does the scope in substance fall - claim construction in Australia

  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 27 2014

The construction of a patent claim is always decisive in opposition, revocation or infringement proceedings. A set of established principles - or

Stay pending inter partes review warranted by plaintiff’s delay in filing suit

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2014

Judge Holderman granted defendant Pacific Marketing International’s (“PMI’s”) motion to stay plaintiff Ignite USA’s patent litigation case pending the

Delhi High Court rules on Vringo-ZTE patent infringement litigation

  • Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • August 27 2014

In a judgment of August 5 2014 a single judge of the Delhi High Court vacated an earlier ex parte interim injunction restraining Chinese telecoms

GE works with HVCC to train workers for future fuel cell plant.

  • Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2014

As reported previously, GE plans to start producing solid oxide fuel cells at a new plant in Saratoga county in 2017. A pilot plant for GE's new

Court denies summary judgment motion as premature prior to Markman hearing

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2014

Pipeline Technologies Inc. ("Pipeline") filed a patent infringement action against Telog Instruments Inc. ("Telog"). Telog filed a motion for summary