We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 13,136

Watch out USPTO, JPO is coming!

  • Burns & Levinson LLP
  • -
  • Japan, USA
  • -
  • April 28 2014

The Japanese government has announced an initiative to reduce patent examination time from 2.5 years to about 14 months. When they achieve 14 months

The 24-month time limit for filing European divisional patent applications removed

  • China Patent Agent (HK) Ltd
  • -
  • China, European Union
  • -
  • April 22 2014

The time limit for filing divisional applications in Europe of within 24 months from the issuance of the first office action or from the first

China introduces CE-PCT system for online filing of PCT international applications

  • China Patent Agent (HK) Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • April 22 2014

China has implemented an online system developed by the State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO) for filing and prosecution of PCT

USPTO issue new patent examiner guidance in view of Myriad and Prometheus

  • Dehns
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 22 2014

The USPTO has issued new guidelines for Examiners to clarify what constitutes patent eligible subject matter for claims involving laws of nature

2,000 public comments submitted responding to proposed changes to FRCP

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2014

More than 2,000 public comments were submitted to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules regarding proposed changes to the Federal Rules of Civil

Andrulis v. Celgene: district court dismisses undivided direct infringement claim but permits joint direct infringement claim to proceed

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2014

Plaintiff Andrulis Pharmaceuticals Corp. ("Andrulis") filed a patent infringement action against Celgene Corporation ("Celgene") alleging direct

Experimental testing in patent actions: federal court issues Notice to the Profession

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 21 2014

Experimental testing and patent infringement actions: they often go hand-in-hand. With respect to providing notice to other parties of experimental

ALJ Gildea denies motion to Compel Expert Deposition in Certain Microphone Packages (337-TA-888)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2014

On April 17, 2014, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 33 (dated April 11, 2014) denying Complainant's Motion to Compel Expert

ALJ Gildea denies motion for summary determination of invalidity for lack of written description in Certain Consumer Electronics With Display and Processing Capabilities (337-TA-884)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2014

On April 15, 2014, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 77 inCertain Consumer Electronics With Display and Processing Capabilities (Inv. No

Changes in New Zealand patent laws: the transition between the Patents Act 1953 and Patents Act 2013

  • James & Wells Intellectual Property
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • April 21 2014

This year will see a change to New Zealand's patent laws, with the Patents Act 1953 being superseded by the Patents Act 2013 on 13 September 2014. As