We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 15,871

The pitfalls of incorporation by reference and numerous arguments in inter partes review

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 1 2014

The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act provides post-grant procedures for challenging the validity of a granted patent before a panel of administrative

Improper inventorship case transferred because of improper venue

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2014

Judge Lefkow held that venue was improper in this patent inventorship dispute, but instead of dismissing, transferred the case to the N.D. Georgia

楼氏电子与歌尔声学专利侵权诉讼评析

  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • October 31 2014

2014 年 4 月潍坊市中级人民法院针对歌尔声学股份有限公司以下简称“歌尔声学”诉楼氏电子苏州有限公司以下简称“楼氏电子苏州”专利 侵权系列案做出了部分判决

Application for leave to appeal granted - 30 October 2014

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 30 2014

On appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal pronounced March 14, 2014. The applicants (collectively, “Sanofi”) are the pat

Supreme Court decides cross undertaking in damages enforceable where UK patent held invalid: no illegality defence where manufacture of product infringed Canadian patent

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 30 2014

In 2006 Servier was granted an interlocutory injunction against Apotex for infringement of a UK patent for a crystalline form of the perindopril

Death of the 'starting point' approach: AstraZeneca v Apotex

  • Shelston IP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 29 2014

A recent decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd (2014) 312 ALR 1 ('AstraZeneca') has clarified

Inventorship in heat tracing cable combination invention cannot be traced to those who merely suggest individual elements

  • SIM. IP Practice
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 29 2014

On September 16, 2014, the Federal Court delivered its decision in Drexan, in which an application to add the inventors, Steve Makar and Konrad Mech

Federal Circuit upholds ITC’s authority to enforce consent order covering third-party products

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC, the

“Removed” versus “removable” controls infringement inquiry

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

Addressing a district court’s summary judgment of infringement, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s

Choose your battles before the PTAB 49 basis is just too many!

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

In a combined decision of three Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), the Board declined