We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 15,195

Supreme Court holds abstract ideas implemented on generic computer ineligible

  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2014

A unanimous Supreme Court has held that merely requiring a generic computer to implement an abstract idea fails to transform the abstract idea into a

The USPTO issues guidelines for subject matter eligibility in view of the Supreme Court's Myriad and Prometheus decisions

  • Venable LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (Myriad) and Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus

Recent IP High Court case: case for employee’s invention related to tamsulosin hydrochloride (IP High Court Case No. H24 (ne)-10052)

  • Shiga International Patent Office
  • -
  • Japan
  • -
  • August 29 2014

Recently, some researchers have filed suits against their companies and gained significant remuneration for their inventions, for example, the blue

Journal 2014 April to June for Australian readers

  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 29 2014

Australian Privacy laws have changed, effective 12 March 2014. To the extent that, for example, databases of customer or supplier details are

Recent patent cases from the Federal Circuit - August 29, 2014

  • Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

In a non-precedential opinion the Circuit determines that patents directed to computer-aided methods and systems for managing a game of Bingo do not

Apple’s motion for permanent injunction denied

  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

After the court found that Samsung infringed one of Apple's patents on summary judgment and a jury found that Samsung infringed two others, Apple

Court reaffirms that honesty is still the best policy

  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

Earlier this week, a court in the Southern District of Texas sent out a not so gentle reminder that lying to the court is never a good idea. In Tesco

ALJ Pender sets 16-month target date and procedural schedule in Certain Devices Containing Non-Volatile Memory (337-TA-922)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

On August 25, 2014, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 5 in Certain Devices Containing Non-Volatile Memory and Products Containing the Same (Inv

Federal Circuit upholds validity of Lysteda patents

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

In two decisions issued under the same name (Ferring B.V. V. Watson Laboratories, Inc.), the Federal Circuit upheld the validity of the Orange

PTAB highlights: voluminous declaration leads to PTAB denial of IPR petition

  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

In a decision of interest, the PTAB denied institution of inter partes review due to the Petitioner's excessive reliance on a voluminous supporting