We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 59

Setting aside a fraudulently obtained judgment

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 7 2013

In Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Highland Financial Partners LP the Court of Appeal set aside a judgment on the grounds that it was obtained by fraud

LIBOR manipulation claim stumbles

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 5 2013

In Deutsche Bank AG v Unitech Global Limited 2013 EWHC 471 (Comm) Cooke J refused permission for the defendants to amend their defence and

The corporate veil remains drawn: VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 26 2013

The Supreme Court has confirmed that allowing the corporate veil to be pierced so as to treat a third party as a co-contracting party is contrary to

Misselling of leveraged notes: not a marginal call

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 16 2013

In Al Sulaiman v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited the Commercial Court considered a claim for breach of duty in recommending investments

Rubenstein v HSBC Bank Plc 2012

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 1 2013

For banks, investment advisers, and their professional indemnity insurers, the Court of Appeal ruling in Rubenstein v HSBC has been eagerly

Zaki & Ors v Credit Suisse (UK) Limited: High Court rules on personal recommendations and suitability under the Conduct of Business Rules

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 1 2011

On 4 October 2011, Teare J handed down his judgment in Zaki & Ors v Credit Suisse (UK) Limited (“CSUK”

Guardian Care Homes v Barclays Bank Plc - LIBOR manipulation: update

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 9 2012

Along with a number of other Claimants, Guardian Care Homes ("Guardian") is claiming approximately £38m from Barclays Bank PLC ("Barclays") in relation to a number of hedging transactions it was required to enter into with Barclays as a condition of Barclays providing certain loan facilities

FOS six-month time limit upheld by High Court

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 23 2012

The High Court confirmed on Wednesday that a decision of the FOS that a complaint against a bank was outside the six-month time limit for bringing a complaint could not be impugned as irrational or unlawful

Common sense counts when construing commercial contracts

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 17 2011

In Rainy Sky S.A and six others v Kookmin Bank 2011 UKSC 50, the Supreme Court provided useful guidance on the role of business common sense in construing a clause in a commercial contract, particularly in circumstances where there are competing plausible constructions, neither of which is clearly preferable on the language used alone

Breaching the perimeter twice could be enough to be ‘by way of business’

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 1 2012

The Court of Appeal has held that an individual who accepted deposits on two separate occasions, that were over 18 months apart, may be liable to conviction for carrying on an unauthorised regulated activity, contrary to the general prohibition (s.19 and 23 FSMA 2000