We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

Practical implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in (Re) Indalex

  • Norton Rose Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 6 2013

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in (Re) Indalex has changed the landscape for both lenders and borrowers in Canada who sponsor registered

The “mirror principle:” a partial "roll up" DIP order can be recognized under Part IV of the CCAA

  • Norton Rose Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 20 2012

Prior to the 2009 amendments (the “Amendments”) to the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (the “CCAA”), courts exercising jurisdiction under that statute could, in the appropriate circumstances, approve “roll up” debtor in possession (“DIP”) financing arrangements