We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,624

Third party communications can lead to lender liability

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

When a lender underwrites a loan application it examines the borrower's business and makes a decision about whether the business model is acceptable

Ninth Circuit holds plaintiffs not required to plead tender or ability to tender to support TILA rescission claim

  • BuckleySandler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

On July 16, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that an allegation of tender or ability to tender is not required to support a TILA

C.D. Cal. Dismisses False Claims Act qui tam suit against group of lenders

  • BuckleySandler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

On July 15, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California dismissed a relator real estate agent's suit against a group of lenders

Fourth Circuit affirms dismissal of class action alleging illegal mortgage referrals

  • BuckleySandler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

On July 10, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's holding that the fees charged by a mortgage company jointly

Georgia Supreme Court applies the business judgment rule to bank officers and directors; decision has implications for corporate officers and directors

  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

In a landmark ruling for officers and directors of Georgia's financial institutions, the Supreme Court of Georgia held in FDIC v. Loudermilk

Supreme Court adopts broad interpretation of bank fraud

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

Choosing to adopt a broad view of what constitutes bank fraud under the federal bank fraud statutes, the U.S. Supreme Court held that to constitute a

U.S. bank wins coverage under Delaware law for $55 million overdraft-related settlement

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

Three class actions were filed against U.S. Bank in 2009 with identical allegations. The plaintiffs claimed that instead of applying transactions in

FDIC v. Loudermilk, et al.Georgia’s business judgment rule (and its limitations)

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

On July 11, 2014, the Georgia Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated decision in FDIC v. Loudermilk,1 addressing squarely the extent to which

Georgia Court of Appeals expands lenders' ability to pursue guarantor deficiency judgment suits beyond foreclosure confirmations

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

The Court of Appeals of Georgia further clarified Georgia's treatment of deficiency judgment suits against guarantors in instances where lenders

State AGs in the news

  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

Bernard Nash and Lori Kalani Antitrust Settlement to Resolve Allegations of Unlawfully Restrained Competition Obtained by New York Attorney General