We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Have you assumed pension termination liability? Long arm of the U.S. PBGC reaches non-U.S. parent

  • Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • April 20 2012

One of the most difficult rules for our non-U.S. based clients to accept is controlled group liability for plan termination under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA

Why are corporate formalities important?

  • Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • March 5 2010

Many compensation and pension actions require the approval of a company's board of directors, or a committee of the board, and for good reason

Don't rely on SPD disclaimers: the US Supreme Court to rule on remedies for deficient employee communications

  • Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • December 3 2010

Readers of our Canadian posts know that allegedly deficient participant communications have generated lawsuits in Canada