We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
On November 3rd, a divided panel of the Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court and held that the plaintiff, a participant in a defined-benefit pension plan, could not sue defendants, plan sponsors, for violations of their ERISA fiduciary duties because the plan was overfunded during the period in question
