We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 52

International Regulatory Update 23-27 September 2013

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • Australia, China, European Union, Germany, Global, Guernsey, Hong Kong, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • October 1 2013

The UK government has launched a legal challenge with the European Courts of Justice (ECJ) on the remuneration provisions under the Capital

EU intensifies sanctions against Iran and Syria

  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Iran, Syria
  • -
  • October 17 2012

The Council of the European Union (“EU”) decided on Monday, October 15, 2012 to intensify political pressure on the governments of Iran and Syria by strengthening existing measures as well as adopting further new sanctions

Escalating U.S.Russia tensions lead to new sanctions, heightened AML risks

  • Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Russia, Ukraine, USA
  • -
  • April 4 2014

The United States and others have imposed economic sanctions and issued anti-money laundering advisories in the wake of the growing political

Russian against time: new sanctions and lowered expectations as Ukraine crisis continues

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Russia, Ukraine, USA
  • -
  • May 1 2014

There's no end in sight for the turmoil in Ukraine. And there's no end in sight for international sanctions against Russia for causing that turmoil

European Union announces adoption of stricter sanctions vs. Iran

  • Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Iran
  • -
  • January 30 2012

On January 23, 2012, the Council of the European Union agreed to impose additional restrictive measures against Iran in the range of industrial sectors, inter alia: in the energy sector, including an embargo of Iranian crude oil imports to the EU; in the financial sector, including against the Central Bank of Iran; in the transport sector; additional export restrictions on gold and on sensitive dual-use goods and technology; as well as additional designations of specific persons and entities

EU decision leads to swift disconnect of Iranian financial institutions

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Iran
  • -
  • March 20 2012

On March 15, 2012, the Council of the European Union (Council) adopted Council Decision 2012152CFSP (amending Decision 2010413CFSP

Iran sanctions update: new EU measures in force

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 4 2013

On 22 December 2012, three new EU measures in relation to Iran were published in the EU Official Journal. These expand the existing suite of EU sanctions

United Nations, European Union, and the United States ease economic sanctions against Libya

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • European Union, Libya, USA
  • -
  • September 19 2011

On Friday 16 September 2011, the United Nations (UN) Security Council adopted Regulation 2009 (2011), which paves the way for further lifting of economic sanctions against Libya, most notably by removing the Libyan National Oil Corporation and Zuietina Oil Company from the sanctions list

Terrorist financingsanctionsmoney laundering

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Global, Guernsey, Malta, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • May 4 2012

HM Treasury has issued a supplement to its Notice on Iran (nuclear proliferation) dated 26 March 2012

Conflicts between German prohibitions of boycott measures and US anti-terrorism law

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, Germany, USA
  • -
  • November 20 2012

The European financing market is increasingly faced with the conflict between, on one hand, US anti-terrorism laws imposing obligatory sanctions in line with US foreign policy and, on the other hand, German foreign trade laws which prohibit boycott measures