We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

While homeowners' policy covered Ponzi scheme losses, homeowners didn't suffer any losses

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2012

On August 15th, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of claims asserted by victims of Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme against their homeowner's insurance policy which included a "Fraud Safeguard" endorsement

Registered rep's theft of customer funds was a covered loss

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2012

On August 1st, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's liability determination in an insurance coverage dispute

Homeowner's insurance does not cover Ponzi scheme losses

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 21 2012

On February 16th, the Second Circuit held that a homeowner's insurance policy does not cover losses suffered in a Ponzi scheme

Separate court case required to determine D&O coverage for former Stanford Bank executives

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2010

On March 16th, the Fifth Circuit held that a separate parallel coverage action was required to determine whether D&O insurers were required to pay for the defense of individual defendants in the cases stemming from the alleged Ponzi scheme perpetrated by R. Allen Stanford