Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-6 of 6
ALJ Shaw denies motions in Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology (337-TA-845)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 21 2013
On February 13 and February 14, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued Order No. 29 and the public version of Order No. 26 (dated February 7, 2013
ALJ Bullock issues notice of initial determination in Certain Video Game Systems (337-TA-770)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 4 2012
On August 31, 2012, Chief ALJ Charles E.Bullock issued a notice regarding the Initial Determination on Violation (“ID”) in Certain Video Game Systems and Wireless Controllers and Components Thereof (337-TA-770
General counsel update
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- China, European Union, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Mongolia, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
- -
- July 11 2012
This is the thirtieth in our series of general counsel updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas
Petitioner seeks review of standard needed to satisfy the domestic industry requirement
- Jenner & Block
- -
- USA
- -
- January 31 2012
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations recently petitioned the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) to review a finding in a video game patent infringement suit
ALJ Bullock rules on motion to compel in certain video game systems and wireless controllers (337-TA-770)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 19 2011
On December 14, 2011, ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 28 (dated December 1, 2011) granting-in-part Complainants Creative Kingdoms, LLC and New Kingdoms, LLC’s (collectively, “Creative Kingdoms”) motion to compel discovery responses from Respondents Nintendo of America, Inc. and Nintendo Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Nintendo”) in Certain Video Game Systems and Wireless Controllers, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-770
Motorola vs. Xbox 360
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 3 2010
Motorola Mobility Inc. recently brought an action before the U.S. International Trade Commission ("ITC") against Microsoft Corp. relating to the importation of the Xbox 360 console
Current Search
- Workarea - Trade & Customs

- Workarea - Litigation

- Workarea - Media & Entertainment

- Workarea - Patents

Suggested Facets
Author
- Brent Caslin (1)
- Eric W. Schweibenz (3)
- Jeffrey A. Koppy (1)
- Joseph A. Saltiel (1)
- Lindsay J. Kile (1)
- Terrence J. Truax (1)
- Thomas C. Yebernetsky (1)
Firm Name
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP (1)
- Jenner & Block (1)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP (3)
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP (1)
Jurisdiction
- China (1)
- European Union (1)
- Germany (1)
- Hong Kong (1)
- Indonesia (1)
- Mongolia (1)
- Singapore (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- USA (6)