We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-1 of 1

Preemption: California SCAQMD may not impose idling-train emissions restrictions that interfere with interstate commerce

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2010

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that California's South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) may not impose restrictions that interfere with interstate commerce on emissions from idling trains