We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 214

Supreme Court of Canada provides further commentary on the Crown’s duty to consult Aboriginal people

  • Lawson Lundell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 16 2013

On May 9th 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Behn v Moulton Contracting Ltd, 2013 SCC 26. The decision provides important

How should a strata deal with the owner from hell? - part 3

  • Lawson Lundell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In my January 2012 and July 2012 blog posts, I discussed the ongoing saga of the Jordisons, arguably the epitome of strata owners from hell. For a

SCC rules roadblock an abuse of process where legal remedies not exercised

  • Bennett Jones LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 16 2013

Last week, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Behn v. Moulton Contracting Ltd., 2013 SCC 26. The case sets out some important

Supreme Court of Canada focuses attention on the collective and individual aspects of Aboriginal and treaty rights

  • Norton Rose Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 17 2013

The forestry company Moulton Contracting obtained licences from the British Columbia government to harvest timber on two tracts of land in the

Aboriginal law the Crown’s duty to consult and the involvement of natural resources proponents in the consultation process

  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 10 2013

Natural resources proponents are often deeply involved in consultations with Aboriginal communities that may be affected by their projects. How far

Supreme Court of Canada holds Aboriginal rights cannot be used to justify road blockades

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 10 2013

In the latest important decision from the Supreme Court of Canada on Aboriginal law, the court held that individual members of an Aboriginal group

The "exclusivity principle" in a planning context

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 27 2011

The Court of Appeal has held that the service of a breach of planning condition notice is a "purely public" act, so the correct way of challenging such a notice is by way of judicial review proceedings

Federal Court determines that the Fair Housing Act applies to university housing

  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2013

In United States of America v. University of Nebraska at Kearney, et al., the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska granted

Supreme Court of Canada rules self-help remedies an abuse of process

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 9 2013

On May 9, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada released reasons in Behn v. Moulton Contracting Ltd., 2013 SCC 26, ruling that resorting to self-help

Court of Appeals reaffirms Public Utility District authority to condemn state school trust lands

  • Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

In 1930, in the first-ever initiative to the people of the State of Washington, the voters authorized Public Utility Districts. At the same time, the