We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Register

Search by keyword

Jurisdiction

Work area

Firm name

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-1 of 1

Supreme Court rejects Stanford's argument: will Bayh-Dole be amended?

Foley & Lardner LLP
-
USA
-
June 7 2011

The Supreme Court on June 6, 2011 rejected Stanford University's argument that it owned important patents

Search results

Supreme Court rejects Stanford's argument: will Bayh-Dole be amended?

Current Search

Suggested Facets