We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,888

We don’t need no intervention: qui tam relator in Omnicare wins big without DOJ

  • Cozen O'Connor
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced the settlement of two qui tam whistleblower lawsuits against Omnicare Inc., the

President Obama issues Executive Order barring sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination by federal contractors

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 22 2014

On July 21, 2014, President Obama issued an Executive Order that makes it illegal for federal government contractors to discriminate on the basis of

Executive Order protects federal contractor LGBT workers

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 22 2014

Yesterday President Obama issued an Executive Order extending antidiscrimination protection on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity

Texas federal court dismisses FCA claims as insufficiently pled

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

In U.S. ex rel. Williams v. McKesson Corp., No. 3:12-CV-0371-B (N.D. Tex. July 9, 2014), a Texas federal court recently dismissed a qui tam

U.S. Postal Service plays the terrorist card against whistleblower

  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Retaliating against an employee for reporting safety violations, the U.S. Postal Service asserted baseless terrorism charges against him. As a result

District courts in California and Colorado hold subcontract references to prime contract disputes procedures do not waive Miller Act rights

  • Pepper Hamilton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Federal district courts for the District of Colorado and the Eastern District of California have ruled subcontract provisions that disputes will be

Presidential Order contemplating no judicial review is no bar when issue raised is due process

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2014

Recently, the DC Circuit held that a Presidential Order prohibiting a transaction to develop wind farms in Oregon because of unspecified national

In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. - D.C. Circuit reaffirms attorney-client privilege protections for corporate internal investigations, reinterprets standard for dual purpose communications

  • Schiff Hardin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

On June 27, 2014, the D.C. Circuit ruled that Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981) (recognizing that the attorney-client privilege may

North Dakota Supreme Court establishes defense to “no damage for delay” clause

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

In June 2014, the North Dakota Supreme Court issued its decision in C&C Plumbing & Heating, LLP v. Williams County et al, No. 20130297. The Court

FEMA cannot hide behind Touhy regulations to avoid FCA deposition

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

In a recent decision, the Eastern District of Louisiana compelled the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") to produce a witness for