We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,706

Davis-Bacon CityCenterDC case

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2014

In a recent decision out of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge Amy Jackson held that the Davis-Bacon Act ("Davis-Bacon") did

Engineer not liable for telling contractor it would be paid for differing conditions

  • Hinshaw & Culbertson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2014

Plaintiff contractor was hired by two Montana Counties ("the Counties") to work on a road construction project. Defendant engineering company was

Employer failed to establish tortious interference by current employees who were secretly operating a competing business

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2014

An employer failed to show that its former employees tortiously interfered with its current and prospective customers, even though they had been

Turbines, heritage assets and merits: a change in the wind

  • Thirty Nine Essex Street
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 4 2014

In the February Newsletter we outlined the Court of Appeal's judgment in Barnwell Manor Wind Energy Ltd v. East Northants DC and others 2014 EWCA

Dot your I's and cross your T's on Ohio's Prompt Pay Act

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2014

Ohio's Prompt Pay Act has real teeth. If a higher-tier contractor is paid for work done by a lower tier and does not pay that lower tier within ten

Recent FCA decision has important implications for contractor disclosures to the government

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2014

A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has important implications for government contractors that make

Recommended provisions for teaming agreements to help assure they are not unenforceable “agreements to agree”

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2014

By entering into teaming agreements, potential prime contractors and subcontractors are able to offer the Government the best combination of

Federal Circuit limits application of demanding “specifically targeted” standard for breaches of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2014

In a welcome decision for federal contractors, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently narrowed the application of the rigorous

2013 in renewable energy project litigation

  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2014

In December 2012, we summarized nearly 10 years of litigation against renewable energy projects. Between the publication of that snapshot and the

Workplace and corporate compliance newsletter (1st quarter 2014)

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2014

On March 4, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lawson v. FMR LLC that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's (“SOX”) whistleblower protection extends to