We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 30

The Tuomey saga continues jury rules that Tuomey violated the Stark Law and False Claims Act

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

After a four-week trial watched closely by many in the health care industry, on May 8, 2013, a jury concluded that Tuomey Healthcare System in Sumter

Double or treble damages under the False Claims Act

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

The Seventh Circuit recently issued a significant decision concerning the proper statutory interpretation of damages under the False Claims Act (FCA

Termination for convenience clauses how convenient are they?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2009

Public contracts usually contain clauses that allow the owner to terminate the contract for the owner's convenience

Ohio’s pay-to-play laws: 2006 version reinstated

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2008

On June 18, 2008, the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas effectively reinstated Ohio’s old law regulating political contributions from contractors by striking down the strict revisions to Ohio’s pay-to-play laws

Under Coleman et al. v. Portage County Engineer, failure to upgrade sewer capacity is immune governmental function

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The Sixth Appellate District recently applied the Ohio Supreme Court's 2012 rule on government immunity for failure to upgrade an existing sewer.1 In

District court allows relator to add qui tam charge to existing retaliatory discharge complaint

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2012

Bulletin on a qui tam lawsuit highlighting the need for a vibrant compliance program in which employees’ concerns are taken seriously and proper compliance is mandated by upper management

Sole source construction procurement for Ohio statutory municipalities

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2013

Ohio Revised Code 735.05 requires a city’s director of public service to make a written contract with the “lowest and best bidder” for all

Hirt v. Crestline Paving & Excavating, Inc. 2013 Ohio 200 (Ohio Ct. App., Sandusky County, Jan. 25, 2013)

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

The Sixth Appellate District recently applied the Ohio Supreme Court's 2012 rule on government immunity for failure to upgrade an existing sewer.1

Appeal of pay-to-play decision changes legal landscape once again

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2008

Once again, the law related to political contributions and contract eligibility has changed

What the courts are saying...

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2008

We begin this month with a look at another case dealing with a public entity’s broad discretion in evaluating bids on public construction projects