We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 158

No coverage for claim first made prior to inception of claims-made policy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, applying New Hampshire law, has held that no coverage was available for a legal

Liability insurers may have duty to defend against federal prosecutions, California Court of Appeal holds

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

The Second Appellate District of California held on May 1 in Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Lopez that California Insurance Code section 533.5(b) does not

How Jackson will affect clinical negligence claims

  • 1 Chancery Lane
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 29 2013

On 1st April 2013 many of the key provisions of the Jackson Reforms came into force. This article sets out the key areas of change that will affect

Testing the ‘security’ of after the event insurance

  • William Fry
  • -
  • Ireland
  • -
  • April 26 2013

A recent High Court judgment has considered the effectiveness of an 'after the event' insurance policy ('ATE Policy') in the context of a security

The Seventh Circuit bars malpractice coverage for an insured law firm despite the firm’s subjective belief that it represented its client correctly

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2013

In Koransky, Bouwer & Poracky, P.C. v. The Bar Plan Mutual Ins. Co., No. 12-1579 (7th Cir. Apr. 2, 2013), the Seventh Circuit affirmed summary

Prior knowledge exclusion bars coverage where law firm’s mistake allowed a seller to void client’s deal

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

Applying Indiana law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that no coverage was available for a law firm that failed

Seventh Circuit requires notice at early signs of potential suit under “claims made” policy

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2013

In Koransky, Bouwer & Poracky, P.C. V. The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Co., No. 12-1579, 2013 WL 1296724 (7th Cir. Apr. 2, 2013), the Seventh Circuit

Dishonesty exclusion precludes coverage for claim based in part upon knowingly wrongful or fraudulent acts

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2013

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, applying New York law, has held that a dishonesty exclusion precluding

Court holds that professional services exclusion in D&O policy applies to broker-dealer’s distribution of REITs

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2013

A federal court, applying New York law, recently held that a "professional services" exclusion in a D&O policy applied to lawsuits against a

Periodical payments: latest developments

  • Kennedys Law LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 19 2013

PPOs are used by many compensators in high value clinical negligence and personal injury claims to fund a claimant's future heads of loss, usually