We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 142

GMC appeal - is dishonesty less serious if the motive andor gain is not immediately apparent?

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 17 2015

Dr A lodged an appeal against a decision of the Fitness to Practise Panel (the Panel) of the Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service of the GMC

Haemophilia and Hepatitis compensation

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 9 2015

David Cameron recently made a public apology in the House of Commons for what was called "the worst treatment disaster in the history of Britain's

A new test for dishonesty in disciplinary proceedings?

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 1 2015

As the leading practitioner text explains ever since the Divisional Court's decision in the case of Bryant and Bench v The Law Society 2007 EWHC

Press round-up: regulatory and professional discipline February - March 2015

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The HCPC welcomed the publication of the Department of Health’s new report on culture change in the NHS which was published on 11 February 2015. The

Committee’s findings on dishonesty quashed on the basis that the practitioner had no reason to lie in relation to a peripheral issue in the case

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 31 2015

Dr R, a Consultant in Oral Surgery, was employed by King’s College Hospital. In 2012 a patient treated by Dr R died subsequent to surgery. Thereafter

High Court holds that NMC Panel erred in its decision making as the full gravity of the case had not been brought to their attention

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The Appellant, the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care (PSA), appealed to the High Court against the decision made by the

New standards for nurses and midwives to comply with: the revised NMC Code

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 19 2015

The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) has updated the Code that sets out the professional standards of practice and behaviour expected from nurses

Panel proceeds in the absence of the Practitioner, and errs in its findings on dishonesty

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 18 2015

Dr L, a General Practitioner (GP) lodged an appeal pursuant to section 40 of the Medical Act 1983 (the Act) in relation to a finding by a Fitness to

High Court holds that GMC Panel should not have found Consultant Ophthalmologist to be dishonest

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 12 2015

The Appellant a consultant ophthalmologist appealed to the High Court against the decision of a Fitness to Practise Panel (the “Panel”) of the

Opening notes do not fix deficiencies of imprecise allegations, High Court re-iterates

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Transcripts of judgments admissible and relevant in disciplinary proceedings as rebuttable prima facie evidence of underlying facts; sufficient