We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,016

Does Pennsylvania permit manufacturing defect claims involving medical devices?

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2014

I am writing to report about a recent dismissal of a manufacturing defect claim made against a medical device manufacturer in the USDC for the

Who is the prescriber?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2014

You've no doubt heard that hard cases make bad law. But sometimes hard cases make no law. That is, the judge decides not to decide, because deciding

Important FOIA decision

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 15 2014

We don't normally follow Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") decisions, but Public Citizen v. U.S. Dep't of Health and Human Services, ___ F. Supp.2d

Third Circuit rejects consumer fraudunjust enrichment class action

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2014

Yesterday the Third Circuit upheld a District of New Jersey decision denying class certification as to plaintiffs' consumer fraud and unjust

A foregone conclusion on a runaway verdict

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2014

From our ivory tower in the kingdom of blogdom, we track cases and litigations from afar, peeking in on them from decisions rendered at specific

Vaccine developer agrees to settle shareholder litigation

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 11 2014

A putative class action instituted by three shareholders against the nowbankrupt biotechnology company Biovest International, Inc., alleging

Renfrow v. Norfolk Southern: bringing the Ohio General Assembly's intent back to the meaning of "competent medical authority" and upholding Ohio's Asbestos Medical Criteria Bill - applying it as written

  • Tucker Ellis
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 10 2014

By way of background, in 2008, the Eighth District Court of Appeals in Sinnott v. Aqua Chem, Inc., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 88062, 2008-Ohio-3806

Later is not better than never

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 10 2014

We do not devote a lot of space to statute of limitations cases. That is not because they are unimportant. To the contrary, statutes of limitations

Supreme Court allows Pom Wonderful to sue coke for false advertising, despite its apparent compliance with FDA regulations

  • Akerman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2014

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court in POM Wonderful LLC v. The Coca Cola Co. (June 12, 2014) held that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Expert couldn’t carry the plaintiff’s water

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2014

Is a product defective because it did not perform as hoped? How about if it failed or even if it broke? Of course not, and this is doubly true for