We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 20

Full court reduces penalty against TPG from $2 million to $50,000

  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 9 2013

Jacobson, Bennett and Gilmour JJ of the Federal Court handed down their judgment on relief in relation to TPG Internet Pty Ltd’s (TPG) appeal against

New house for the random penguin gets the nod

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, New Zealand, USA
  • -
  • April 9 2013

The clearances keep coming with the Unites States, Australia, New Zealand and the European Union's competition authorities having all unconditionally

Random House & Penguin - proposed combination of global book publishing businesses

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 31 2013

The ACCC will not oppose the proposal by Bertelsmann SE and CO KGaA and Pearson Plc to combine their global book publishing businesses (Random House

ACCC institutes proceedings against Luv-a-Duck for false, misleading and deceptive conduct

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 31 2013

The ACCC instituted Federal Court proceedings against Luv-a-Duck Pty Ltd for engaging in false, misleading or deceptive conduct. The ACCC alleges the

Google Inc v ACCC: More detailed analysis

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 6 2013

Further to our breaking news post this morning (we promised there was more to follow!), our Anthony McKew and John Swinson have prepared an alert on

Flight price advertising is it a single price?

  • Cordato Partners
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • January 28 2013

Call it a single price, a total price or a final price, the Australian Consumer Law requires businesses to show an all-inclusive price in their

Those drugs cost how much?? Chemist warehouse price list misleading but not for the reasons you might think

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 29 2012

Last Monday the Supreme Court of Queensland held that a price list published by various Chemist Warehouse pharmacies in Cairns, Nerang, Coolangatta and other parts of Queensland was likely to mislead or deceive and therefore contravene clause 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), schedule 2, section 18

ACCC challenges ticketing market power

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • July 18 2012

In a consent judgment handed down in December 2011 (ACCC v Ticketek Pty Ltd 2011 FCA 1489) the Federal Court accepted the terms of an agreement between the ACCC and Ticketek Pty Ltd (Ticketek) which resulted in a total of $2.5 million in penalties

Competition Appeal Board of Singapore decision on SISTIC exclusive agreements

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, Singapore
  • -
  • July 18 2012

In the first abuse of dominance case under Singapore’s Competition Act, the Competition Appeal Board (Appeal Board) upheld an abuse of dominance decision by the Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) against SISTIC, Singapore’s largest ticketing services provider

Telecommunications

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 31 2012

The ACCC accepted court-enforceable undertaking from FOXTEL Management Pty Limited (FOXTEL) and announced it would not oppose the proposed acquisition of AUSTAR United Communications Limited

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy