We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Fashion industry puts on its game face

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 23 2012

As fashion houses are presented with the ever-challenging goal of achieving and maintaining brand recognition, many are now attempting to engage consumers in both the real and virtual worlds

Hey Papi! Big Pimpin' thinks you ain’t no playa when it comes to his 4040 mark

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 26 2010

As many of you baseball fans surely know, "4040" is a term reserved for ballplayers who have hit 40 home runs and stolen 40 bases in a single season

Supreme Court to revisit rules concerning international exhaustion of copyright

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2010

Signaling that it intends to wade into waters last visited in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L’Anza Research Int’l, Inc., 523 U.S. 135 (1998), the Supreme Court this week agreed to review Omega v. Costco Wholesale Corp

Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., et al.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2009

Court upholds magistrate’s order granting motion to compel production of communications between in-house counsel, client, and third party where defendant failed to establish that communications were made to third party in furtherance of common legal interest