Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 19
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc, et al v. Fung, et al
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- January 20 2010
In copyright infringement action against operator of BitTorrent websites, court grants summary judgment to plaintiff movie studios on liability for inducement to infringe
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al. v. Fung, et al.
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 26 2010
In a case arising out of the infringing use of BitTorrent technology, the court grants plaintiff copyright holders a permanent injunction against defendants, finding that plaintiffs met all of the factors for a permanent injunction under eBay
Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v. iiNet Limited
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- Australia
- -
- February 10 2010
In trial that may be the first of its kind in the world, Federal Court of Australia dismisses copyright infringement complaint brought by U.S. and Australian movie studios against an Australian ISP; although the court finds that defendant’s subscribers infringed plaintiffs’ copyrights using BitTorrent technology, it holds that defendant did not authorize such infringement
Summit Entertainment, LLC v. Beckett Media, LLC
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- January 27 2010
Court grants plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction in copyright and trademark infringement action against publisher of a Twilight fanzine that used plaintiff’s Twilight trademark as well as images from the Twilight films and promotional images that were taken from plaintiff’s publicity website
Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 24 2010
Court grants summary judgment for YouTube and Google in copyright infringement action for large amount of copyrighted material on website, holding that defendants are entitled to the DMCA 512(c) safe harbor because they had insufficient notice of the particular infringements
UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. Veoh Networks, Inc., et al.
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 16 2009
Defendant Veoh operates an Internet-based service that allows users to share videos with others
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al. v. Tenenbaum
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 16 2009
In a file-sharing copyright infringement action, the court grants plaintiff record companies’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s fair use defense
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al. v. Tenenbaum
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 16 2009
Court grants plaintiff record companies’ request for a permanent injunction barring defendant from downloading unauthorized copies of plaintiffs’ copyrighted works and requiring defendant to destroy all such files, but court denies plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction barring defendant from “promoting” use of the internet to infringe copyrights, on First Amendment grounds
Capitol Records, LLC, et al. v. Videoegg, Inc., et al.
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 18 2009
The district court held that California-based defendant Hi5 Networks, which operates a social networking web site where allegedly infringing video files are posted, had sufficient contacts with New York to exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and then granted the defendant’s motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California
Maverick Recording Co., et al. v. Harper
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 3 2010
Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision granting summary judgment to plaintiff record companies for copyright infringement, based on defendant individual’s sharing of digital audio files, but reversed the lower court’s determination that the defendant was an “innocent infringer.”
