Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 41
UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. Veoh Networks, Inc., et al.
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 16 2009
Defendant Veoh operates an Internet-based service that allows users to share videos with others
Capitol Records, LLC, et al. v. Videoegg, Inc., et al.
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 18 2009
The district court held that California-based defendant Hi5 Networks, which operates a social networking web site where allegedly infringing video files are posted, had sufficient contacts with New York to exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and then granted the defendant’s motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California
Arista Records LLC, et al v Usenet.com, Inc, et al
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 8 2009
In copyright infringement action against file sharing service, court holds defendants directly infringed plaintiffs’ copyrights in their sound recordings and defendants are liable for vicarious and contributory infringement and inducement to infringe; court grants in part plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions for discovery abuse and prevents defendants from asserting DMCA safe harbor defense
Maverick Recording Co., et al. v. Harper
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 3 2010
Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision granting summary judgment to plaintiff record companies for copyright infringement, based on defendant individual’s sharing of digital audio files, but reversed the lower court’s determination that the defendant was an “innocent infringer.”
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al. v. Tenenbaum
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 16 2009
Court grants plaintiff record companies’ request for a permanent injunction barring defendant from downloading unauthorized copies of plaintiffs’ copyrighted works and requiring defendant to destroy all such files, but court denies plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction barring defendant from “promoting” use of the internet to infringe copyrights, on First Amendment grounds
In re Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 22 2009
In this litigation, several copyright actions brought by record companies against individual downloaders were consolidated into one action
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al. v. Tenenbaum
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 5 2009
In copyright infringement action involving peer-to-peer file sharing, court grants plaintiff record companies’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s fair use defense and jury awards plaintiffs $675,000 for willful infringement of 30 copyrighted works
Summit Entertainment, LLC v. Beckett Media, LLC
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- January 27 2010
Court grants plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction in copyright and trademark infringement action against publisher of a Twilight fanzine that used plaintiff’s Twilight trademark as well as images from the Twilight films and promotional images that were taken from plaintiff’s publicity website
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 14 2010
District court denies Veoh Networks’ motion for attorney’s fees in DMCA safe harbor litigation, holding, inter alia, that Veoh failed to demonstrate that UMG acted in bad faith by failing to use DMCA’s notice and takedown procedure before filing suit and that UMG’s claims were not objectively unreasonable
Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 20 2010
In a copyright infringement action, the court rejected the defendant’s request for a jury instruction that states “statutory damages must bear a reasonable relationship to the harm suffered by each plaintiff.”
Current Search
- Workarea - Media & Entertainment
- Workarea - Internet
- Firm Name - Loeb & Loeb LLP
- Author - Jonathan Zavin
Suggested Facets
Author
- David Grossman (1)
- Jonathan N. Strauss (1)
- Meg Charendoff (1)
- Tal Dickstein (1)
- W. Allan Edmiston (1)