We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 48

Australia's new Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Bill

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 17 2014

On 27 March 2014, the Australian government introduced a Bill to regulate the commercial use of indicia and images associated with three major

Chemist Warehouse web pages fall foul of TGA's advertising laws

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 6 2014

He Therapeutic Products Advertising Complaints Resolution Panel has requested that Chemist Warehouse formally retract "health information" web pages

Full federal court dismisses Australia post trade mark appeal regarding digital post Australia

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 23 2013

Australian Postal Corporation v Digital Post Australia 2013 FCAFC 153 On 6 December 2013, the Full Federal Court of Australia dismissed an appeal

Google AdWords navigating the way

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 13 2013

Ever done a web search for your business and found a competitor ad further up the list than your site? Optimising your visibility on the results

Significant policy change to Google's trademark AdWords in Australia

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 22 2013

From 23 April 2013, Google's Trademark AdWords policy will be updated so that Google will no longer restrict advertisers purchasing and using trade

Dynamite attempts to enforce a feel-good gaming patent against Aruze

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 6 2013

In the recent case of Dynamite Games v Aruze Gaming & Ors, Justice Emmett of the Federal Court of Australia considered the validity and infringement

Seafolly sues competitor over misleading and deceptive Facebook posts

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 8 2013

On 29 November 2012, the Federal Court held that comments posted by an individual on her personal Facebook page, and the page of her business, were

Google not responsible for misleading and deceptive adword advertisements: High Court

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 6 2013

On 6 February 2013, in a much anticipated judgment, the High Court of Australia unanimously allowed Google's appeal from a decision of the Full Court

High court denies Optus leave to appeal TV Now copyright decision

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 2 2012

In September, the High Court consisting of Justices Gummow, Bell and Hayne refused to grant Optus special leave to appeal the decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in the Optus TV Now case

Recent Google AdWords cases in Australia: from Googles to spectacles

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 24 2012

Optimising visibility on search engines’ result pages has become a core component of any online marketing strategy