We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 330

CJEU issues ruling on internet browsing technology in the Meltwater case

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 5 2014

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) today issued its decision in the Meltwater Case C-36013, a long-running (5 year) dispute between

High Court awards "headline" damages against Times Newspapers for failure to remove defamatory material from website

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 27 2014

A recent High Court case, in which Times Newspapers Ltd ("TNL") was ordered to pay a claimant £60,000 in damages in respect of a defamatory story

ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 24 2014

On 18 June 2014 the Federal Court ruled that Coles engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of sections 18, 29(1) and 33 of the

Comparative advertising: Sainsbury's Tesco judicial review on misleading comparisons

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 11 2013

Sainsbury's reportedly initiated judicial review proceedings on 31 October 2013 in order to challenge the Advertising Standards Authority's

EU informal agreement dealing with orphan copyright works

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • July 27 2012

On 6 June, the European Parliament and Council informally agreed draft legislation to deal with orphan works, so called because the copyright owner is unknown

Yale University granted summary judgment on defendant’s counterclaims related to Yale’s possession of van Gogh’s The Night Cafe because court found the act of state doctrine precluded any challenge to Yale’s lawful ownership of the painting.

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2014

Defendant’s great-grandfather was an art collector in Russia during the early 20th century. When the Bolsheviks came to power in 1917, they

Copyright law still clouded following US Aereo decision

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • July 4 2014

In a significant decision for content owners and cloud service providers, on Wednesday 25 June 2014 the US Supreme Court has ruled that Aereo Inc's

High Court grants FAPL site-blocking injunctions against websites providing live streaming of football matches

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 6 2013

On 16 July Mr Justice Arnold handed down his decision in FAPL v BSkyB in which he granted blocking injunctions against six major UK ISPs in relation

Online copyright infringement: when Google images finally meets French law

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • France
  • -
  • March 9 2011

While Google’s exemption from liability for trademark infringement through its AdWords service has now been well established by the Supreme Court, the situation with regard to copyright infringement remains more uncertain. The latest service to be considered is the Google Images search, in regard to which the Paris Court of Appeal recently issued a long-awaited ruling

Broadcasters can prohibit streamed internet retransmission of their broadcasts by the "communication to the public" right

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 19 2013

On 7th March the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "CJEU") held in ITV Broadcasting Ltd and others v TV Catchup Ltd1that live streaming