We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 270

Dunn v. DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of defendant DreamWorks Animation on plaintiff’s breach of implied-in-fact contract claim

UMG Recordings Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2013

Ninth Circuit upholds DMCA safe harbor protection from copyright infringement liability for defendant video-sharing site Veoh, affirming grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor

Slate v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.,

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

District court grants summary judgment in favor of ABC News and related entities, finding that investigative journalist Gregory Slate was equitably

Benay v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 23 2012

District court grants summary judgment in favor of defendants on implied-in-fact contract, finding lack of privity between plaintiffs and defendants

Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 25 2012

Ninth Circuit affirms district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants on copyright infringement claims finding, as a matter of law, no substantial similarity between protected elements of plaintiff’s works and the defendants’ “CARS” movies, and that plaintiff’s claim for breach of an implied contract was time-barred under California’s two-year statute of limitations

Viacom International v. Google Inc.,

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2013

On remand from the Second Circuit, district court grants summary judgment in favor of Google and its YouTube platform on all copyright infringement

Washington v. National Football League

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 5 2012

District court grants NFL’s motion to dismiss class action filed by former football players alleging that, by not allowing the players the rights to game films and images from the games in which they played, the NFL is monopolizing the market for former players’ likenesses, in violation of antitrust laws

Raw Films, Ltd. v. Does 1-32

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2011

District court, on its own motion, severs all but one Doe defendant accused of committing copyright infringement by uploading and downloading pornographic film using peer-to-peer file sharing system BitTorrent, and orders plaintiff to show cause why certain of its conduct did not merit sanctions

Harper v. Maverick Recording Co

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 8 2010

U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in copyright infringement action brought by record companies against plaintiff who asserted the “innocent infringer” defense, and Justice Alito dissents

Price v. Stossel

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2010

Ninth Circuit reverses district court’s decision granting defendant television network’s anti-SLAPP motion in a defamation action brought by a television evangelist, finding that the defendants made a false statement by broadcasting a video clip of the plaintiff’s sermon in a misleading context

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy