We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-8 of 8

Anti-poaching agreements under attack

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 20 2012

Healthcare employers need to be mindful of a recent focus by federal antitrust regulators on agreements with competitors limiting solicitation and hiring

Antitrust challenge to employers’ exchange of pay information continues

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2012

In a case that has continued for more than five years, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan recently issued a decision regarding the exchange of detailed, non-public information about the compensation rates of nurses among Detroit-area hospitals

The issues 2013: upcoming legal topics in the Czech Republic

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • Czech Republic
  • -
  • February 1 2013

The adoption of the new Civil Code and the Act on Corporations, effective as of 1 January 2014, is a step of great importance for the Czech law. There

Nurse wage decision highlights risks of sharing wage information

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 3 2010

On July 22, 2010, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York issued a decision that is important to employers

Court refuses to certify class action alleging hospitals fixed nurse wages

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 2 2009

This week, a federal court in Illinois denied class certification in Reed v. Advocate Health Care, a large antitrust case brought by nurses against their hospital employers

Antitrust attacks on “no-raiding” contracts and sharing of wage information

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 3 2010

Clients frequently ask us for our legal opinions as to whether they may lawfully enter into no-raiding contracts, prohibiting them from hiring or soliciting other businesses' employees

Second Circuit holds that denial of motion to amend class certification order does not constitute an order for purposes of interlocutory appeal of class certification under Rule 23(f)

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2011

On May 3, 2011, the Second Circuit issued an important opinion in Fleischman, et al. v. Albany Medical Ctr., et al., No. 10-0846 (2d Cir. May 3, 2011), denying a petition for interlocutory appeal of a district court’s denial of a motion to amend a class certification order because the petition was untimely pursuant to Rule 23(f

Oregon federal court permits declaratory relief suit to proceed in race to judgment non-compete dispute

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 13 2012

In light of Valentine’s Day, a blog involving two competitors specializing in heart rhythm therapy seems fitting

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy