We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,152

Buy more, save more: exclusivity conditions, loyalty rebates, and competition law

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

It can sometimes be unlawful for a supplier with a strong market position to offer its customers long-term supply terms with volume rebates which are

Auto dealers allege Carfax is a competitive lemon in antitrust suit

  • Constantine Cannon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

More than 120 auto dealers in 17 states are alleging in a new $50 million antitrust suit that they paid higher prices for less reliable vehicle

Antitrust and competitionthe EU weekly briefing, vol. 1, issue 27

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 13 2013

On 8 May 2013, the ECJ dismissed an appeal by ENI S.p.A. (ENI) against a judgment of the General Court (Case T 3907) which largely upheld the

Court of Justice of the European Union dismisses Eni SpA’s appeal in the synthetic rubber cartel

  • Roschier
  • -
  • European Union, Italy
  • -
  • May 15 2013

The Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ") handed down its ruling in the appeal by the Italian company Eni SpA ("Eni") (one of thirteen

Federal Court sets aside PMPRB decision regarding COPAXONE syringes for the second time

  • Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 7 2013

On April 30, 2013, Justice Zinn of the Federal Court set aside a decision of the PMPRB (the "Board"), which ordered (Order, Reasons) Teva to pay the

Competition Bureau appeals Competition Tribunal’s decision in TREB case

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 14 2013

On May 14, 2013, the Competition Bureau launched an appeal of the Competition Tribunal's April 16, 2013 decision in the Toronto Real Estate Board

Google: the benign monopolist?

  • White & Case LLP
  • -
  • Global, USA
  • -
  • November 20 2009

There is something about copyright which evokes passion

Legal privilege under Swiss competition law

  • Lenz & Staehelin
  • -
  • Switzerland
  • -
  • May 3 2013

As of 1 May 2013, the protection available under the concept of legal privilege has been expanded and harmonized in Switzerland. The new law

California Court of Appeal allows injunction under unfair competition law to prevent horizontal competitor from diverting business through unlawful means

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

For many years, California's Unfair Competition Law had no traditional standing requirements. But since the passage of Proposition 64 in 2004

Competition Tribunal finds no abuse by the Toronto Real Estate Board

  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 17 2013

On April 15, 2013, the Competition Tribunal dismissed an application by the Commissioner of Competition with respect to certain policies and