We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 130

District court grants temporary restraining order in Phoebe Putney litigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

The next step of the on-going Phoebe Putney litigation is completed. On Wednesday, April 15, the district court for the Middle District of Georgia

Natural gas companies settle antitrust suit stemming from joint bidding

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 25 2013

On Monday, April 22, 2013, after rejecting the initial settlement agreement, Judge Richard Matsch (D. Colo.) approved a revised settlement of a suit

Private equity firms achieve only partial dismissal of “buying club” antitrust lawsuit

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 12 2013

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently limited the scope of a proposed shareholder class action against a number of

A new front in the patent wars: CJEU asked for guidance on limits to injunctive relief

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • April 11 2013

The patent wars between large technology companies continue unabated. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is set to provide guidance on

Supreme Court Comcast decision makes antitrust class action certification more difficult

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2013

The Supreme Court's decision in Comcast Corporation v. Behrend, an antitrust case involving a class of more than two million current and former cable

Supreme Court hears oral argument in pay-for-delay patent settlement antitrust case

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

The Supreme Court's ruling in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., will almost certainly have major implications for the viability of Federal

Abuse of IP rights under China's antitrust rules: recent cases have a potentially serious impact

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • March 22 2013

Corporations doing business in China, based on their intellectual property (IP) rights, need to be aware of the potentially serious impact of China's

Brussels Court of Appeal rules that legal professional privilege applies to in-house counsel

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Belgium
  • -
  • March 19 2013

On 5 March 2013, the Brussels Court of Appeal delivered a judgment finding that, under Belgian law, in-house counsel are covered by legal

A Dutch court hands down the first substantive damages judgment in the Netherlands for an infringement of competition law

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Netherlands
  • -
  • February 27 2013

In a recent judgment, a District Court in the Netherlands (the DCA) handed down a judgment in what is the first substantive damages judgment in the

Supreme Court limits availability of state action immunity from federal antitrust liability

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 20 2013

The Supreme Court decision in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., makes clear that state action immunity from federal antitrust laws is