We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 34

SCOTUS: Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., new standing test for false advertising and false association claims under the Lanham Act

  • Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2014

In Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States held that to have standing for a false advertising

Supreme Court creates new standing test for asserting false action claim under Lanham Act

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2014

On March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Justice Scalia, in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control

US Supreme Court sets forth standing requirement for Lanham Act Section 43(a) false advertising claims, rejecting requirement of direct competition

  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2014

Significant for litigators and would-be litigants alike, the US Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control

Lexmark v. Static Control: Supreme Court concludes that false advertising plaintiffs need not be direct competitors

  • Workman Nydegger
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2014

On March 25, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., addressing who may sue for

Delaware Court rules in favor of former LLC member in LLC’s competition claim

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2014

Last week, the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled that because a limited liability company (LLC) agreement did not contain a provision precluding or

A summary of major developments in key areas - General Counsel update September 2013

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, Hong Kong, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • September 19 2013

The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 and changes to the Companies Act 2006 made by the

Fourth Circuit certifies business conspiracy question to Virginia Supreme Court

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2013

Virginia Lawyers Weekly reports that the Fourth Circuit is asking the Virginia Supreme Court to answer two questions about the interpretation of

American Express v. Italian Colors: United States Supreme Court reverses Second Circuit refusal to enforce class action waiver under Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 24 2013

Plaintiffs a group of merchants who accept American Express cards filed a putative class action against American Express alleging of the Sherman

U.S. Supreme Court re-affirms class action waivers in arbitration agreements

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 21 2013

Again applying the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) to uphold agreements requiring parties to arbitrate their disputes rather than litigate them in

General Counsel Update - June 2013 - A summary of major developments in key areas

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • June 21 2013

The Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors' Report) Regulations 2013 (Regulations) to amend the structure of UK annual reports have