We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 41

FTC and L’Oréal settle gene-targeting false advertising allegations

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

L'Oréal USA Inc. and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have agreed to settle allegations that L'Oréal advertised its anti-aging

Retailer associations seek interchange fee antitrust settlement reversal

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2014

The National Retail Federation (NRF) and the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) recently submitted briefs to the Second Circuit Court to

State AGs in the news

  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 19 2014

Apple Inc. has agreed to settle the antitrust class action lawsuit brought by 33 AGs and consumers alleging that it conspired with publishers to fix

Delaware Supreme Court finds fee-shifting bylaw presumptively valid

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2014

Rafael Nadal, the top-ranked tennis player in the world according to the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP), has noted that "as a tennis

State AGs in the news

  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2014

Ohio statewide primary elections took place on May 6. Incumbent Attorney General Mike DeWine (R) and challenger David Pepper (D) were nominated

State AGs in the news

  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2014

Delaware Attorney General Declines 2014 Reelection, Will Seek Governorship in 2016 Delaware AG Joseph "Beau" Biden III announced today that he will

A business can assert false advertising for indirect harm

  • Fennemore Craig
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

The false advertising provision in the Lanham Act may be asserted to protect anyone who falls within the "zone of interest" protected by the statute

SCOTUS: Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., new standing test for false advertising and false association claims under the Lanham Act

  • Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2014

In Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States held that to have standing for a false advertising

Supreme Court creates new standing test for asserting false action claim under Lanham Act

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2014

On March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Justice Scalia, in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control

Lexmark v. Static Control: Supreme Court concludes that false advertising plaintiffs need not be direct competitors

  • Workman Nydegger
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2014

On March 25, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., addressing who may sue for