We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 11

Als Memasa & Anor v UBS AG 2012 SGCA 43

  • Wong Partnership
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • September 10 2012

A claim of misrepresentation in relation to the purchase of certain investment products should be allowed to proceed to trial for the full facts to be examined; further, the issue as to whether a non-reliance clause is effective should be fully considered at trial

General Counsel update - legal guide edition 32

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Myanmar, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 29 2012

A summary of major developments in key areas

2012 in review: key legal and regulatory developments

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • December 20 2012

This table provides an overview of the key developments in 2012 to date

International regulatory update 7 - 11 January 2013

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, Global, India, Poland, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 14 2013

EMIR: Extension of scrutiny period for Commission Delegated Regulations Basel III: Basel Committee releases revised version of Liquidity Coverage

Examining the validity of non-reliance clauses in investment management documents

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • September 6 2012

Non-reliance clauses are common fixtures in investment management agreements and account opening terms and conditions between financial intsitutions and their clients, protecting the institutions from any potential misadvice regarding investments and financial products

Airocean case - lessons learnt

  • Stamford Law Corporation
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • October 2 2012

Peter Madhavan (Madhavan) and Ong Seow Yong (Ong), two former IDs of Airocean, were acquitted by the High Court in July and their five-year disqualifications from holding office as directors were overturned

The duty of a dealer to indemnify its stockbroker against losses

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • October 6 2011

In Kim Eng Securities Ltd v Goh Teng Poh Karen 2011 SGHC 201, a brokerage firm (the "Plaintiff") brought an action to enforce an indemnity against a dealer (the "Defendant") in respect of losses arising out of share trades executed by the Defendant's clients

Directors' duties in relation to company announcements

  • Wong Partnership
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • March 31 2011

The decision of the District Court on 3 March 2011 in the case against the former directors of Airocean Group Ltd ("Airocean"), a company listed on the Sigapore Exchange ("SGX"), especially the severity of the sentence meted out against Peter Mahdavan - an independent non-executive director of Airocean - was surprising to many

General Counsel Update

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • China, European Union, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 7 2011

This is the twenty-seventh in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

General counsel update: 31 May 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 31 2012

This is the twenty-ninth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas