We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Luxury watch manufacturers under spotlight for alleged refusal to supply independent repairers

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • August 19 2011

On 5 August 2011, the European Commission opened a formal investigation into allegations against several luxury watch manufacturers for the refusal to supply spare parts to several independent repairers

In-house legal advice on competition not covered by legal professional privilege

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • September 23 2010

Attempts to extend legal professional privilege to internal company communications with in-house lawyers in EU competition cases have been dashed, following a ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on 14 September 2010 in the Akzo Nobel case (C-55007P

In-house legal advice on competition not covered by legal professional privilege

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • September 15 2010

Attempts to extend legal professional privilege to internal company communications with in-house lawyers in EU competition cases have been dashed, following a ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on 14 September 2010

Legal professional privilege does not apply to in-house lawyers recommends Advocate General

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 5 2010

On 29 April 2010, Advocate General Kokott delivered her Opinion on Akzo Nobel and Akros Chemical's appeal (case C-55007P) seeking protection of confidentiality of internal communications between a company and its in-house lawyers under legal professional privilege (LPP

ECJ provides clarification on commercial agency contracts

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • April 27 2009

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has responded to two preliminary questions referred from a court in Germany on the interpretation of the indemnity provisions in the Directive on commercial agents (89653EEC