We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

This week at the SCC

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 18 2013

The Supreme Court of Canada refused leave to appeal this week from several cases of interest to Canadian businesses and professions. The decisions

BCCA finds limited partners not purchasers of property sold to limited partnership

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 27 2013

When a limited partner sells property to the limited partnership, is the limited partner itself a purchaser of that property, or is the only

This week at the SCC

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 9 2012

The Supreme Court of Canada released one decision this week of interest to Canadian businesses and professions

UK Supreme Court to pierce the issue of the corporate veil

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 20 2012

The UK Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal in a case that raises important issues regarding the legal doctrine of “piercing the corporate veil”

BCCA adresses Tercon test for public policy and exemption clauses

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 19 2012

In its well-known decision in Tercon Contractors, the Supreme Court of Canada set out a three-part test for the enforceability of contractual exemption clauses

SCC to consider rectification of contracts

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 26 2011

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal in a case involving the rectification of contracts

Galambos v. Perez: the Supreme Court of Canada clarifies the law of fiduciary relationships

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 26 2010

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Canada significantly clarifies the law of “ad hoc” fiduciary relationships Galambos v. Perez, 2009 SCC 48