We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 609

The price for being “unreasonable” Body Corporate ordered to pay costs in management rights dispute

  • Piper Alderman
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 13 2014

The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal is ordinarily a "no cost" jurisdiction - meaning that parties to a dispute ordinary bear their own

Issuing employee shares - the rocky path that can follow

  • Addisons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 7 2014

A recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia in MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour 2014 FCA 990 highlights the difficulties that can

What factors show there is a concluded and binding agreement?: Absolute Analogue Inc v Sundance resources Ltd No 3 2014 WASC 283

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 3 2014

This case provides some useful insight into the factors a court will consider when determining whether a concluded and binding agreement has arisen

An entitlement to rely on the statutory due execution assumptions does not confer proprietary rights good against third parties: Esperance Cattle Company Pty Ltd v Granite Hill Pty Ltd 2014 WASC 279

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 3 2014

A sublessee was entitled to rely on the assumption of due execution under section 129(5) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of a sublease

Finding a ‘fraudulent and dishonest design’ for the purpose of liability of third parties who knowingly assist in a breach of fiduciary duty: Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd; Curtis v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd; Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Almad Pty Ltd 2014 NSWCA 266

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 3 2014

There have been inconsistent formulations of the "dishonest and fraudulent design" element of the second limb of Barnes v Addy since the Court of

Court orders corrective advertising for Coles Bakery Stores

  • Cordato Partners
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In June 2014, the Federal Court made findings that Coles Supermarkets had contravened the Australian Consumer Law: by packaging bread products with

Going to market - consumer law update

  • Chapman Tripp
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • September 30 2014

Our monthly review helps you to keep tabs on consumer law developments in New Zealand and overseas. This edition looks at a recent New Zealand case

How far can you go to get what’s yours?

  • Bartier Perry
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 30 2014

Deciding whether or not you can enter a third party's premises to repossess your goods is always tricky. Can you? Can't you? What if your agreement

General counsel update September 2014

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Russia, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • September 29 2014

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Court's new rules come into force on 1 October 2014 and are to apply to any arbitration

Food for thought for directors of Australian companies

  • HopgoodGanim
  • -
  • Australia, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 26 2014

Tesco PLC is one of the most high profile and best known UK public companies. As the owner of a large chain of supermarkets, it has a deserved