We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,863

Supreme Court charts when foreign companies may be sued in Illinois: is the stream of commerce overflowing?

  • Quarles & Brady LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The Illinois Supreme Court recently issued a decision that will significantly affect when foreign corporations may be sued in Illinois courts. In

Third Circuit adopts and expands “employee” test for Title VII cases

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently adopted a six-factor test to determine whether a shareholder-director of a company could be

Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal holds statute establishing standard of proof in slip-and-fall cases is retroactive

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In Kenz v. Miami-Dade County and Unicco Service Co., 2013 (Fla. 3d DCA April 24, 2013), Florida's Third DCA ruled that 768.0755, Fla. Stat

Ohio Supreme Court holds mortgage servicing not subject to Consumer Sales Practices Act

  • BuckleySandler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On May 14, the Ohio Supreme Court held in response to two certified questions from a federal district court that the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices

Partnership law permits one party to unilaterally withdraw from oral agreement if venture is not for a definite term or a particular undertaking

  • Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Section 62(1)(b) of the Partnership Law provides that a partnership formed by an oral agreement may be unilaterally dissolved "if no definite term or

Inevitable disclosure of trade secrets is not an independent cause of action in Georgia

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

In Holton v. Physician Oncology Servs., LP, No. S13A0012, 2013 WL 1859294 (Ga. May 6, 2013), the Georgia Supreme Court held that Georgia law does not

No breach of fiduciary duty where allegation of trust and reliance is not reasonable

  • Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

In Pappas v. Tzolis, an action between former members and managers of an LLC, the Court of Appeals addressed the question of whether one member

Breach of contract exclusion bars coverage for claims naturally resulting from breach

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Applying Michigan law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held that a breach of contract exclusion precludes coverage for

Enforceable contract or unenforceable agreement to agree? The importance of specificity in teaming agreements

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

A recent case from the Eastern District of Virginia provides another reminder that teaming agreements subject to Virginia law must include specific

SEC officer director bars: by what standard?

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

Sometimes it can be difficult to determine if you actually won. This may be the case for the SEC with the Second Circuit's ruling in SEC v. Bankosky