Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 65
Does the in pari delicto defense apply in derivative actions?
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 21 2011
“In pari delicto” is a Latin phrase meaning in equal fault
Court rejects control requirement for director liability
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 3 2011
Outside directors and their counsel should take note of yesterday’s decision by the First District Court of Appeal in Hellum v. Breyer
When a corporation dissolves, does the attorney-client privilege live on?
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 22 2011
Generally, a corporation’s suit for legal malpractice results in a waiver of the attorney-client privilege
Nevada Supreme Court adopts Delaware approach to fair value burden of proof
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 20 2011
Recently, the Nevada Supreme Court answered several questions concerning how to determine the "fair value" of shares under Nevada's dissenters' rights statutes (found in NRS Chapter 92A
Does California’s anti-waiver statute void choice of forum agreements?
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 29 2011
California Corporations Code Section 25701 is derived from Section 410(g) of the Uniform Securities Act (1956
One may be the loneliest number but it's not a partnership
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 11 2011
Yesterday, a California Court of Appeal concluded that the idea of a one person partnership under the Revised Uniform Partnership Act has as much reality as a number whose square is a negative number
Court decides buy-out claims are derivative
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 9 2011
When a shareholder sues corporate officers and directors, she must decide whether to bring a direct action (which may be a class action) or a derivative suit
Court decides a “division of the waters” does not violate the Corporations Code
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- November 16 2011
Anyone who is familiar with California knows that water is the key to its agricultural abundance and vast urban spaces
Nevada Supreme Court addresses delivery of dissenters’ rights notices
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 13 2011
Last week, the Nevada Supreme Court answered the question of whether notice of dissenters’ rights must be delivered to both stockholders of record and beneficial owners
Ninth Circuit finds that in contract interpretation “words of a feather flock together”
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 24 2011
Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion that will likely be cited most often for its conclusions regarding scienter, loss causation and Rule 10b-5
