We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 65

No directors, no officers, no employees and no agents now what?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

Occasionally, a corporation may find itself with no directors and no management. Yet, the corporation does not cease to exist. One might wonder what

Before this corporation was formed, this contract knew it

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

In Section 4.13 of Bishop & Zucker on Nevada Corporations and Limited Liability Companies, we discuss who may be liable on pre-incorporation

Reasonable efforts may be a promisor’s best efforts

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 29 2012

Contracts often include clauses requiring the parties to exercise their “best efforts” but don’t say what exactly this means

Court holds promoters may owe fiduciary duties to non-shareholder investors and a lamentable example of notice

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2012

Yesterday, the California Court of Appeal issued an opinion addressing two important questions involving the liability of corporations and promoters - Cleveland v. Johnson, Cal. Ct. of Appeal Case No. B233762 (Oct. 11, 2012

Federal judge refuses to find that california “can have no real interest” in loans closed out of state

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 28 2011

The geographic reach of California’s statutes continues to be tested in the courts

Got judgment? It may not be too late to add a judgment debtor

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2011

Suppose that you sue a limited liability company to enforce a note and win your case

Bill would mandate indemnification of LLC agents

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 26 2013

California's current limited liability act permits indemnification of any person (including any manager, member, officer, employee, or agent of the

Does the in pari delicto defense apply in derivative actions?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 21 2011

“In pari delicto” is a Latin phrase meaning in equal fault

When a corporation dissolves, does the attorney-client privilege live on?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 22 2011

Generally, a corporation’s suit for legal malpractice results in a waiver of the attorney-client privilege

Nevada Supreme Court clarifies status of LLC charging orders

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2012

Last week, the Nevada Supreme Court analyzed the rights of a judgment creditor of a membermanager of a limited liability company