Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 28

Competitive situation contrary to contract as defect of the rental object Federal Court of Justice,decision dated October 10, 2012 XII ZR 11710

Mayer Brown LLP
-
Global
-
April 24 2013

Providing competition protection may be of existential economic significance to the tenant of a commercial property. In particular, the scope and

Competition Tribunal finds no abuse by the Toronto Real Estate Board

Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
-
Canada
-
April 17 2013

On April 15, 2013, the Competition Tribunal dismissed an application by the Commissioner of Competition with respect to certain policies and

Competition Tribunal dismisses abuse case against Toronto Real Estate Board

McCarthy Tétrault LLP
-
Canada
-
April 16 2013

On April 15, 2013, the Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) released its decision in the high-profile case against Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB

What matters: A review of 2011 and 2012

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
-
USA
-
April 1 2013

As you know, the last two years have seen a somewhat improved, but by no means robust, business climate. At the same time, structural shifts in the

The issues 2013: upcoming legal topics in the Czech Republic

CMS Cameron McKenna
-
Czech Republic
-
February 1 2013

The adoption of the new Civil Code and the Act on Corporations, effective as of 1 January 2014, is a step of great importance for the Czech law. There

Preview 2013 (UK law)

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
-
European Union, United Kingdom
-
January 15 2013

2013 will herald some significant changes to the UK legal arena, notably in the corporate area in relation to executive remuneration and narrative

2012 in review: key legal and regulatory developments

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
December 20 2012

This table provides an overview of the key developments in 2012 to date

Antitrust “tying” claims dismissed against homebuilders

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
-
USA
-
December 14 2012

The US District Court for the Eastern District of California recently ruled on the type of activity that constitutes a claim of impermissible “tying” under federal antitrust law, holding that the alleged misconduct of a group of housing developers did not give rise to an antitrust violation