We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 4,295

Are you operating your business lawfully?

  • Penningtons Solicitors LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 24 2013

Sponsors will be aware that the current sponsor guidance (paragraph 648 (g) Tier 2 sponsor guidance and paragraph 600 (x) Tier 4 sponsor guidance

Tenants get a break on break clauses

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 24 2013

Court confirms part of quarter's rent paid in advance recoverable by tenant on exercise of a break option In an unexpected decision, the High Court

Outcome of Lord Taylor's review of planning guidance

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 23 2013

CLG has published its response to the consultation on Lord Taylor's review of planning guidance. The upshot is that while most of the review's

Lack of evidence of impact on native title rights key for decision to grant mining lease

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 23 2013

Following on from the decision that Adani Mining Pty Ltd complied with its obligation to negotiate in good faith, the decision in Adani Mining Pty Ltd

Many holiday-house lettings unlawful important Land and Environment Court decision for landlords

  • Gadens Lawyers
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 22 2013

Hundreds of central coast holiday home-rentals in the Gosford local government area have been exposed as unlawful by a recent Land and Environment

Under Coleman et al. v. Portage County Engineer, failure to upgrade sewer capacity is immune governmental function

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The Sixth Appellate District recently applied the Ohio Supreme Court's 2012 rule on government immunity for failure to upgrade an existing sewer.1 In

Can you get your money back? The B.C. Court of Appeal addresses the forfeiture of deposits (again)

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 22 2013

Can a party who has failed to consummate a transaction get back a "deposit"? The British Columbia Court of Appeal considered this issue once again in

Unsuccessful lawsuit by condo owner - the cost implications

  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 22 2013

In a previous blog, we reported on a case, Harvey v. Elgin Condominium Corporation No. 3, where an unhappy unit owner sued the Corporation for

Informal system of cleaning satisfactory a win for the defendant

  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 22 2013

Judgment in the matter of Ryland v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited 2013 NSWCA 120 was handed down on 3 May 2013. The Plaintiff in this matter

Landmark Queensland Court of Appeal decision confirms developers’ protection against the wrongful refusal to settle by purchasers

  • HopgoodGanim
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 22 2013

HopgoodGanim has successfully acted for the Receivers and Managers of Queensland's Port of Airlie Boathouse development in defending an attempt by a